• zod000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 hours ago

    It must be a pretty shitty little legend seeing as I didn’t recognize his name. If he somehow manages to completely destroy Meta for the good of mankind, then we can call him legendary. Until this he is just an entitled piece of shit.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Do Facebook execs also come in VMax and Gigantomax forms? Like if this guy is a legendary Pokemon, what else does Meta have in its deck?

    Also, more seriously, if tech companies can’t be profitable without eminent domaining everything else, maybe they should be eminent domained themselves. Be utilities for the public good or shut the fuck up and play by the rules like all the other kids.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I made a comment a few months ago saying exactly this, and that it’s clear they are fighting it so hard in court because they won’t be able to even use LLMs there will be so little training data otherwise. People said I was incorrect and that fb, etc would just pay for it. Turns out I was correct.

  • akademy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    The absolute arrogance of these people.

    They don’t seem to understand that we DON’T NEED AI.

    If it’s only “profitable” by stealing then don’t fucking do it.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have an awesome business model for a company that gives guided tours of celebrity houses, but I’ll never make any money if they just keep locking their doors on me! That’s unfair and discriminatory, and I will not be profitable unless I can enter those houses whenever I wish!

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Have you noticed that all social media companies are involved in AI?

      The second use case (that looks even uglier) is to use it to simulate users on their platform and influence them via chat.

      Not only to buy certain products but also to change political views. Imagine how much money one can make by doing that. No more bot farms needed.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Don’t forget to show Taylor Swift’s bathroom as she’s pooping! You gotta have that on the tour!

      What do you MEAN she called the cops?? This is a violation of my entitlement!!! I’m rich and therefore don’t have to play by others rules, or make any sense! The world revolves around ME!!! Never forget that! Money is the most important aspect of life, and I won’t take sass from a wage slave!

  • tymon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    fuck do you mean “legendary”

    he’s just another shithead capitalist

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Legendary cunt maybe.

      He came third in the UK election in 2010. The first thing he did was join hands with the Conservatives, put them in power and start a spiral of decline.

      Fuck him and everything he ever stood for.

    • chingadera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Of all the comments, why is it just you and one other questioning this ‘legendary’ status?

      There is absolutely nothing you can do at any social media company to receive that title.

      I’m going to do something we should all do, block this “news outlet” from everything you possibly can. Godamn.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    My business of stealing items from the local Walmart and then selling them to people for a lower price outside of Walmart will never be profitable if I have to pay for those items or ask Walmart to give them to me first.

    (What’s hilarious is that even the above business plan holds more water than the average AI service which cannot achieve a profit even if the thefts are legalized because of the still high operating costs.)

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Quite a lot of voices say ‘you can only train on my content, [if you] first ask.’ And I have to say that strikes me as somewhat implausible because these systems train on vast amounts of data. I just don’t know how you go around, asking everyone first,

    Never does the question of NOT training these “systems” at all enter the conversation.

  • OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you can’t afford to pay for one of the raw materials required to make your product, then you don’t deserve to have a business selling that product.

    In any other scenario would this even be in question?

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      In any other scenario would this even be in question?

      In any other industry that has been successfully regulatory captured…