Source (Bluesky)

The images in the quoted post

  • haverholm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    How the hell does using a drawing tablet correspond in any way, shape or form to using a generative “AI” that leeches off actual artists’ skill, talent and labour?

    No, don’t try to argue against that question. Internalise it, and understand it.

      • haverholm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        I understand the point of the argument, but as you say — it’s a false premise because only one of them is an art tool. The other is a faulty clip art machine that literally steals from artists.

      • Tyoda@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think the argument is that some people can’t afford a nice drawing tablet or drawing supplies, so all they have is a mouse that is “impossible” to draw with, and AI allows them to… “create”. source: bottom-left post in the image

        • nightlily@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          Even before generative AI I saw these arguments in music production that they had to pirate stuff because they couldn’t afford Serum/Abelton Live etc.

          Never mind that there have been free digital music tools for decades now. Maybe a little clunkier but money has never been a barrier towards creating art.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          If you can’t afford a box of crayons and some paper, how the hell could you afford a computer?

          Edit: by “you”, I’m of course referring to people who would make the argument. I know your reply wasn’t actually making the argument.