• Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    The oddest thing is that a lot of ai people seem to fail that understanding that not every piece from an artist is their best work. Sometimes it is a casual fun drawing to e.g. join a trend.

    That is the only way the “better” ai version shit makes sense. The perspective that every piece needs to have a “clean” style and preferably photorealistic. And obviously photorealistic or “clean” Styles require attention to detail and a more serious commitment to the piece.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I have always loved art, and one of my favourite pieces is Nu descendant un escalier n° 2, because it represents an artist struggling to come to terms with ideas like photography, moving pictures, quantum physics in their early days, while trying to both show and hide the humanity being depicted

      AI has none of that. AI doesn’t even have the soul of a child’s doodle pinned to the fridge.

    • Zulu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think there’s an angle for people who wish they could take part in the good drawing too.

      It’s like that kid in school that would trace a really good drawing and then change the color a bit and say they did it themselves, but for adults. ‘Aren’t you happy i made it better?’ Just equates to me as ‘i want attention for the art too’

      The sad part of course being that instead of even having the guile to pick up a utensil and trace it themselves, they just copy paste it to a program and become a middle man for downloading and uploading an image.

      Setting aside the ‘soul’ of the drawing or how it appears visually, it’s just sad to watch someone make a cheap facsimile of the thing you made at the cost of a few mouse clicks and making the climate a tiny bit worse.

      All that just for ‘siel’

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    They were just trolling her, sadly. That’s all they needed to prove. That it would get her reaction

  • inlandempire@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This trend just yells peak capitalism to me. What are people meaning by posting themselves as toys, are they finding it fun to he seen as collectibles, consumer products? Out of every setting one could picture themselves, this is what they enjoy? Bring broken down to their marketable parts?

  • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Thanks for the two new artists to follow on Bsky OP. Been slowly switching over because I don’t use either this or Twitter much, but it’s kind of needed when you follow furry art and stuff.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    I thought the AI pic was an action figure made from the drawing at first…

  • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are tons of problems with AI.

    This drawing “lacking personality” is not one of them. And if I were to choose which one I like most, it would be the right one. The left looks too smudged.

    This is my opinion as an artist myself.

    • belastend@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The left one looks like all AI slop does: soulless. The same font every time, the same expression every time, the same pencil strokes every time. It looks shit.