Summary

The Atlantic has published unredacted attack plans (non-paywall link) shared in a Signal group chat of senior Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

Editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg released the full texts after officials denied sharing war plans or classified information, arguing transparency was necessary amid accusations of dishonesty.

The leaked messages detailed U.S. military strikes targeting Houthis in Yemen.

    • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s so wild that they are very demanding of touchpoints up front but totally clueless about everything throughout the chat…

  • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    3 days ago

    They waited till he entered his girlfriends apartment building?.. seems on point for the military. How many people died? I think someone said 53? And was that guy the only target? So many deaths for one dickhead…

      • kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Good thing the US doesn’t recognize the authority of the International Criminal Court, so there’s no risk of them having to face consequences for their war crimes.

        They even have a law that makes it illegal to cooperate with the ICC in bringing US personnel to justice, and that allows the president to use any force necessary to prevent it from happening.

      • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        More risk to the US personnel or assets, and it would be a diplomatic and domestic incident if it came out that US troops or assets were operating in Yemen. It’s much safer to bomb them from a plane.

        Also there’s the terror aspect where the US government presumably wants to cause chaos and fear explicitly to make continuing the blockade less appealing to both the Houthis and the people of Yemen.

    • rothaine@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      So strange that no one is talking about this aspect of it.

      Like I’m no war expert (obviously neither are they), but wouldn’t it cause far fewer causalities, and be far cheaper and easier, to just hide in the bushes and shoot the guy when he comes out? Since they know exactly where he is?

      1 death vs 53, 1 bullet vs whatever TF it takes to level a building?

      • ammonium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re going to need a team of people, fly them in and out and make sure they get back home alive or it might hurt the president’s polls. It might be cheaper but it’s much riskier. Nobody in the US cares about those 52 other people so that doesn’t really matter to them.

        I’m surprised they didn’t use drones.

    • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why kill one when you can kill a bunch. Rack it up to collateral damage then go have a beer at the bar. Maybe leak some more texts before your Telsa test drive.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not sure about legality, and not that the US military care, but confirming someone id, and that he is visiting a gf or family member, then bombing the house, sound like a war crime.

    • ProfHillbilly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      It is a crime and Israel is doing it too so Trump and the whole clown car just follows the lead. I am all for killing people who have done heinous shit but killing everybody in whole build just to get tom them is beyond fucked up.

      • Aux@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Israel, Russia and now the US just joined the club!

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      We actually have munitions that don’t blow up too. We could literally have killed just him. This isn’t 20 years ago anymore.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    200
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    So many people talking about the fact that this leaked, and not enough are talking about what leaked.

    We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

    If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process. But hey, they’re not Americans, so they don’t count.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        No one should be surprised. We’ve seen who these people are time and time again. But we shouldn’t be so desensitized to moral bankruptcy that we completely overlook such a disgusting disregard for human life.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          idk what to tell you anymore, i don’t care about human life lmao.

          You all ruined it for me by being so fucking stupid. Like i’m sorry, but how is a satirist supposed to live in a climate where everybody is just fucking stupid. The answer, inevitably, is benevolent disregard for human life, because clearly nobody cares about it enough to do anything about it.

    • Bouzou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s like the confirmation of Brett Kavenau when he threw a hissy fit about how he “likes beer”…

      That in and of itself should have disqualified him. If someone isn’t capable of being even-keeled and not throwing a temper tantrum, then they shouldn’t hold the highest judicial office in the land…

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Since when do American leaders care about “collateral damage” ?

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

      As someone who was around for “We’ll put a boot in yer ass, it’s the American way” this does not surprise me in the slightest.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      “If we discussed dropping a building on a terrorist we should also discuss bombing weddings, so let’s stick to using proper communication channels and following proper protocol for records”

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process

      I can think of a few deaths worth celebrating

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        There are only a few handful for whom I’d pull the trigger myself, but quite a multitude more that I would celebrate their passing with glee.

        • Glide@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I just think, especially when we’re pulling the trigger ourselves, we should be sad, maybe disappointed, that it’s come to that. Bad people are still people, and while I believe they throw away their right to life when they start indescriminately revoking it from others, I don’t ever want to find myself happy to take life. I’ll be happy later, in the better world that’s been created.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      We’re talking about the same guys funded by the guy who says the ideal society is Mordor. This doesn’t surprise anyone. Everyone is expendable for the company’s machine, they wouldn’t mind targeting innocent people, let alone causing civilian casualties when targeting real terrorists.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

      Correction: They dropped a building on a “terrorist” (read: brown person the US doesn’t like).

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        There is a reason to attack him. I don’t agree with the whole situation but shooting at cargo ships and American warships is going to get a response. I just expect the world’s most technological military to do a better job of not attacking innocent people in getting to him.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t agree with the whole situation but shooting at cargo ships and American warships is going to get a response

          It’s going to get a response, but that response is as immoral as the status quo it’s trying to protect.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s immoral on it’s face because of how they’re doing it is my point. There’s certainly a political philosophy discussion to be had about the underlying international system and American system, but there’s none to be had about throwing extra explosions around to “intimidate” a third country.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              but there’s none to be had about throwing extra explosions around to “intimidate” a third country.

              There is, and not having that discussion does nothing but help the imperial core maintain their facade of moral legitimacy even as they murder innocent people all over the world.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      These dumbfucks have no empathy. They will tell you empathy is weakness. In reality empathy is a social defense mechanism. If we all have empathy for each other it limits the harm we do. What they’re missing is not having it isn’t some kind of advantage, historically we are the most savage to those without empathy. It causes the mob to turn their empathy off and give in to their worst impulses. They think they’ll be the first ones in history to avoid that fate. They won’t.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Look at what JD “couch fucker” Vance wrote. Regarding potentially delaying the strike. He didn’t give any shits about the benefits or risks to lives, only the optics (oil prices going up), politics and his hatred for helping Europe.

        Sure, clearing the shipping lanes is “good” but it’s more helpful to Europe “gross” so that’s a tick “con” colum.

        Their “worst case scenarios” were all “it could look bad”.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    So yesterday they lied to congress more often than they told the truth? So many “I don’t recall” when in fact they could pull it up on their phone and know? Traitors to American families every one of them

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      100
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Lying about sleeping with an intern - impeachment

      Lying about sharing classified information on an insecure group chat - “he’s just a widdle guy 😢”

      • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        Especially bad when the whole “reason” for that impeachment was about investment fraud or something and only became about sex with intern after they couldn’t prove anything else.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Whitewater real estate scandal. Kenneth Starr was investigating him for that and when they couldn’t find anything actionable, they switched to the perjury and sex.

          I’m not a fan of a President using their power to have an intern blow them (I don’t think there’s meaningful consent there), but it doesn’t compare to raping multiple women, peeping on teenage girls at Miss Teen America, and making comments about how you’d fuck your daughter if that was an option. The aristocrats!

          • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Stop taking away women’s agency with this “meaningful consent” bullshit.

            At the time I was in the Air Force, and a bunch of us were discussing this. Well over half the women at the table has the attitude of “Are you kidding? Of course, blowing the most powerful man in the world is hot as hell”.

            Monica was obviously into it and an adult.

            • bss03@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              “Sure my boss took advantage of me, but I will always remain firm on this point: it was a consensual relationship,” Lewinsky wrote in 2014. “Any ‘abuse’ came in the aftermath, when I was made a scapegoat in order to protect his powerful position.”

              Lewinsky says she now sees that her relationship with Clinton was full of “inappropriate abuse of authority, station, and privilege.”

              “Now, at 44, I’m beginning (just beginning) to consider the implications of the power differentials that were so vast between a president and a White House intern,” she wrote. “I’m beginning to entertain the notion that in such a circumstance the idea of consent might well be rendered moot.”

              https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/02/26/monica-lewinsky-vanity-fair/375452002/

              @andros_rex@lemmy.world didn’t take away Lewinski’s agency.

              • andros_rex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                “Any ‘abuse’ came in the aftermath, when I was made a scapegoat in order to protect his powerful position.”

                And that’s what seals the deal for me. If Clinton gave a shit about Lewinsky, he would have at least tried to protect her somewhat in the fallout. He had fun, she had consequences.

                People on the left treated her like shit - I guess it is further evidence that Bill Maher has always been awful. She got played on manipulated on both sides. Her reputation was trashed and she had a hard time finding work after - it destroyed her career and future.

                This was a boss that took advantage of his power and authority to get a couple loads out, and then disposed of the person once they became our nation’s designated bearer of the scarlet letter.

                I had sex with men who were much older than me when I was in my early twenties. The difference was that they weren’t my boss.

                Dan Savage I think had something about “campground rules” too - if you are going to have sexual relations with a legal consenting adult you are significantly older than, it’s on you to use your greater experience to leave that partner better than you found them.

            • andros_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Are you a woman? How the fuck do you meaningfully say no to sex with the President?

              Go fuck yourself with that “taking away women’s agency” bullshit. Bosses don’t get to sleep with employees. Teachers don’t get to sleep with students.

              Monica got treated like shit for decade. That’s not “hot as hell” unless you’re a creepy misogynist that gets off on women being public humiliated.

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      I fucking hate this shit so much.

      So you don’t recall a lot, huh? So clearly you’re not fit for your position, good luck finding a new job tho.

    • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      I am in lots of group chats and don’t read every one of them to completion. So not all members of the chat knowing or remembering what happened is to be expected.

      • pachrist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, but the second something juicy happens, we all scroll back and get caught up pretty quickly.

      • WildPalmTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        You are in group chats at this level? Because, I’m sure as fuck is not. And if I was, I’d read every message.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    212
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    A CIA spokesperson asked us to withhold the name of John Ratcliffe’s chief of staff, which Ratcliffe had shared in the Signal chain, because CIA intelligence officers are traditionally not publicly identified. Ratcliffe had testified earlier yesterday that the officer is not undercover and said it was “completely appropriate” to share their name in the Signal conversation. We will continue to withhold the name of the officer. Otherwise, the messages are unredacted.

    The news outlet these fucktards accidentally leaked their detailed operational plan and timeline to…

    … is still excersizing better OPSEC than the actual head of the CIA.

    EDIT:

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=_2sODSpJo2A

    Watch this clip of Mark Kelly with some pretty on point questions for Gabbard and Ratcliffe, listen to their responses, and go read through the full text chat.

    Watch more of the hearings.

    I think there’s a pretty decent case Tulsi actually fucked up enough in her testimony that she actually did a perjury, Ratcliffe however, was both a bit more conciliatory and ever so slightly more honest, and also a bit better at just giving ‘I don’t recall’ answers.

    • slumlordthanatos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I have been in fucking EVE Online corporations with better OPSEC than these guys.

      This would be hilarious if I didn’t fucking live here.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Oh yeah absolutely.

        I never partook in any of that myself, but yeah I’ve watched/listened to some hours of youtube videos doing their best to recount some of the more insane history of subterfuge, sabotage, getting rival clan members installed as spies, as CEOs and masters of coin in their enemy’s corps, draining all their funds and liquidating an entire clan after a 3 year long deep undercover op with the spies regularly being on voicechats of some kind, and then just doing the deed and ghosting everyone …

        …fucking bonkers shit for a video game clans… but yeah, many of those kinds of stories show people with better understanding of spycraft and opsec than… the literal, actual, current heads of the CIA, DoD, etc.

        absolute clown world.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        … So, the angle they are going with now is that this was a very serious offensive and nefarious act perpetrated against Mike Waltz, the guy who created the group chat.

        M Waltz is saying that well hey maybe this piece of shit Goldberg guy (the journalist) hacked his way into the chat? Maybe it was an inside job, or an outside cyberattack, and somebody swapped out Goldberg’s phone number with another one of my contacts, so that when I tried to add a legit person who should have been in that group chat, it tricked me and added Goldberg!

        … Yeah. These idiots are unfortunately in charge of investigating themselves, and at least Mike Waltz seems to be saying ‘no it is utterly impossible that I accidentally added the wrong guy to the chat, I was clearly the victim of some kind of hack!’

        https://youtube.com/watch?v=hJ2gxzPEzjU

        Yes, Mike Waltz ‘takes full responsibility’… by positing an inconsistent mess of possible cyberattacks/manipulation techniques that could have been used against him, absolutely no way he fat fingered a contact add, nope.

        • YerLam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Did they leave out some high ranking general with the same name? In their frantic CYA narrative isn’t there some key person missing from the chat, and if so why not name them?

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            I mean, you nailed it right there, if it was that, then they could just say who had the similar name.

            … but that isn’,t possible when everyone involved is a sentient piece of ratshit molded into the form of a human, that has absolutely no ability to ever admit any fault or take responsibility for anything, ever.

            These people are all completely unqualified, sociopathic opportunists with moral fiber composed of fucking anti matter, they’d instantly explode if they ever attempted to flex those moral muscles and develop any actual principles.

            I have, entirely seriously, known multiple meth/fentanyl addicts (in the process of detoxing) with better moral character, sense of responsibility for their actions, honesty, loyalty, and principles they strive to live by.

  • FE80@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    This is becoming a theme stretching back multiple administrations. The people at the top either don’t understand IT acceptable use policies, cybersecurity controls, classification divisions of systems, records retention policies, etc; or they are intentionally ignoring them. And for bonus points, everyone at this level is an espionage target.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_email_controversy

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_group_chat_leak

    • blady_blah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’re ignoring them. Acceptable use policies are annoying and they’re too powerful to follow the rules.

      • slag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s quantifiable and expected threat by a known entity, versus nebulous threat by a unknown entity.

        The records will be scrutinized. The FoIA requests will happen. The hack of their private infrastructure might not ever happen, and even if does, the foreign actors are not necessarily going to leak the records back to the US constituents: the real perceived threat.

        They’ll gladly risk operational security for less paper trail. Every. Fucking. Time.

  • Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Lmao Waltz saying he is going to try and figure out “how the heck he got into this room” and then the first text screenshot literally says “Michael Waltz added you to the group” is so goddamn hilarious to me.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      107
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Oh wow, proof it also has disappearing messages enabled.

      I don’t know the legality of the messages being able to disappear, but the fact it’s enabled is a clear cut violation of the law.

      • bampop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        For any other administration, this would be a catastrophe. For the Trump administration, it’s Thursday.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah sure thing. The guy who has already been caught mishandling classified documents… The guy who literally ate the notes from a meeting he had with Putin so nobody would see them.

          Right.

          • silverlose@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            4 days ago

            Holy crap that’s insane I had to look it up and yes apparently that happened. wtf there’s so much news I can’t keep up

            • rigatti@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              4 days ago

              And that’s from last term when things were more chaotic, with less focused effort towards dismantling everything.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          4 days ago

          Lol. That would be uncharacteristic at this point. They need to show us the servers before I believe that

        • Nfamwap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          4 days ago

          And how likely do you think that is? Given the clown show that has gotten them to this point.

        • pticrix@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Don’t worry, given their apparent compliance to threat-model, it’s most likely stored somewhere on an adversarial database. Compliance by idiocy.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      ·
      4 days ago

      Oh, yeah, these guys sat in front of the Senate yesterday and flatly lied about all of it. At the end, one of the Democrats said that it wouldn’t be long before they had the transcripts, which would be compared to their testimony, analyzed for discrepancies, and legal options considered.

      The MAGA Nazis aren’t really worried, they know there is no possible way that HitlerPig, Big Booby Bondi, or the Nazi legislature will do anything about it, and even if they did, HitlerPig would just pardon them, but at least it’s one more egregious national security lapse/lie that the Dems can beat them with forever.

      IF the Dems ever show the guts to fight back.

    • 60d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      This is some real old white guy, how did this get here i am not good with computer energy lmfao

    • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Same vibe as that flat-earther in Behind the curve who ran this laser experiment that ended up proving the curvature of the earth and, upon seeing the evidence, went like “Huh, how about that, guess we gotta analyze the data some more to see what’s going on.”

    • brognak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The other thing I noticed up there is that it says “MAR added MAR”. Not sure if those are two people with the same Signal/Contact name/intials, or how that happened (as a Signal user, best guess is group link but that is also would be in the log at the top)

    • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      Nonono this time they really got him. He’s truly fucked now. He’s getting slammed over this. America every day for 8 years now.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    166
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    The Atlantic putting a paywall on this when they got the texts for free from a government handout is peak America…

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        4 days ago

        Exactly why I used to subscribe to the Washington Post until Bezos wiped his ass with it. I’ll have to look into subscribing to The Atlantic now.

        • bean@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yeah I’m considering dumping NYT too. I heard Reuters was a better ‘investment’. Please someone tell me if that’s wrong. I don’t want to support Billionaires.

          • Logi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Wired “has been killing it” during the ongoing soft coup, to quote my journalist wife, and we’ve replaced our WaPo subscription with that. We can never dump NYT just because of the recipes.

        • CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          I have been The Atlantic subscriber for about 5 years now. I think it has pretty great writers on staff. Their physical subscription is pretty cheap too.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        This was a gift given to the Atlantic, though. I guess you gotta milk it for what it’s worth.

      • BlemboTheThird@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m not disagreeing in a general sense, but it’s funny to make that argument here when this info basically fell into the journalist’s lap. Very little actual journalism went into making this story possible

        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          But think of how much money is going to be needed for the security detail this guy is gonna need for the foreseeable future. Or the costs of retaining legal representation to help him navigate through what is guaranteed to be an endless sea of investigations, frivilous lawsuits, etc. that the Trump administration is guaranteed to launch until something sticks.

          I wouldn’t be getting on any planes any time in the near future if I were him either.

          This story may have fallen into his lap, but it sure as hell wasn’t free.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      JG got the texts for free but he’s probably gonna need someone watching his 6 now. And I’m pretty sure a lawyer is billing for helping them figure out how to publish the details and still avoid getting trapped into anything illegal, like naming the CIA agent.

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Nah, the guilty parties already told congress nothing the texts did not contain classified material, so releasing them should be fine. It’s not like this administration would suddenly change its mind now, surely.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        OP linked an archive link, and updated the post to have it.

        But I clicked it before and had the same reaction as if I opened a box labeled “dead dove”.

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    My favorite quote is the one where he says it could leak lol

    “…If this leaks we look indecisive”

    Try incompetent beyond reason. This clown world is funny if people weren’t dying.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Also this:

      Pete Hegseth, after broadly describing the big picture situation/rationale for the strike, that same block of text you pulled the ‘we look indecisive’ from:

      But, we can easily pause. And if we do, I will do all we can to enforce 100% OPSEC.

      … I don’t even know what to say.

  • That Annoying Vegan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    if this were any other regime, they’d be facing jail time for using a non-approved messaging app. But this is the year of the trumptard, so they will face no consequences.

  • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    So thankful we avoided GeNoCiDe JoE!

    This is way better! …but then again, the world is only black or white… so maybe not. I guess the internet wanted this and so here we are.

    • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Wasn’t it Obama that normalized the indiscriminate use of drone strikes in civilian areas without congressional approval?

      Democrats are just more competent about their use of military action.

    • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      This trope if pathetic, only Americans think this way. You need an actual opposition party then, not neoliberalism. Because fascism wins either with your way of thinking.

      No politician offering universal healthcare, affordable housing, paid time off, better wages, resistance against genocide, etc. and etc. And youre mad at the voters? You see how fucked up that is?

      Blaming others and voters will keep making your situation worse and worse, until they come after you as well. You could instead use your energy to protest in various ways or to support or help to challenge and create new parties or structures.

      Keep dogging on your own citizens and youre gonna be next. Literally the playbook of Nazis. “First they came for…”

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      4 days ago

      The Trump administration has a lot of catching up to do if they want to get even remotely close to the number of casualties and the staggering destruction caused by Genocide Joe.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sigh. Harris would be more competently bombing people in Yemen, so I’m happy with Trump in charge when it comes to this.

    • GreyAlien@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      50
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Ah yes, some pro-Palestinians who didn’t cast their votes are the reason democrats lost.

      This trope is getting old to be honest.

      edit: don’t forget to vOtE bLuE!

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        they most certainly influenced the election, whether or not they were responsible or not is a bit more complicated to answer.

        Whether or not they should’ve voted is the simplest possible answer you could give. The answer was yes, and they didn’t.

        • GreyAlien@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Even if they voted, it wouldn’t have changed anything.

          But please, continue using them as tokens for your deflection. It will make your country better. What could go wrong…

      • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Yes, you hold some of this blood in your hands. Complaining won’t absolve you of it. Thank you for your disservice, what are you doing to help correct it?

            • GreyAlien@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              4 days ago

              I know, but I feel bad watching you people fall into a fascistic society while you fight eachother to know who’s the most righteous.

              • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Most people over here have been beaten down almost completely by a sick capitalist culture. The group who is “fighting for who’s the most righteous” (<- a phrase I love, for what that’s worth) is the same group fucking most of us.

      • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        The prevalent message is what counts.

        Kinda like saying a handful of idiots pushed a narrative about Hillary’s server. More idiots bought that line but it was started by a small group.

        • GreyAlien@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          4 days ago

          The well known argument that the 90 millions eligible voters that did not vote were influenced by a few people protesting the US aiding and supporting a genocide.

          very rational, very smart…Keep on deflecting instead of bettering your party, that will show the republicans currently destroying what is left of your society.

            • GreyAlien@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Are you really using the margin of the popular vote in a gerrymandered country to make a point?

              It’s sad.

              edit: I, too, remember how Hillary won the 2016 election thanks to the popular vote… oh wait.

              • frezik@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                4 days ago

                Do you understand how gerrymandering works? It doesn’t apply directly to Presidential elections.

          • Beetschnapps@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 days ago

            Why not both? It’s entirely possible to push for progressive policies while also acknowledging the role cultural influence and the internet holds…

            Easier that being an asshole really.

            • GreyAlien@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              16
              ·
              4 days ago

              Because it’s nonsensical? You people are trying to put all the blame of trump win on some vocal minority from the left.

              This is dishonest, and quite disturbing. Especially seeing how frequent this argument keep popping up on every thread related to trump destroying your country.

              • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                It’s this rhetoric that plays perfectly into the class divide that the corporate asshats want everyone to fall for. “It’s your fault for not voting for the other corporate shill party!” Disregarding the fact that the main difference is one party is just mask off, and the other is mask on fascist. As many people rightly point out, the dems are controlled opposition. If they weren’t there would literally have been much more fight and pushback from them for the four years before Trump 2.0 (especially since they knew it was coming faaar in advance) rather then the milquetoast response we got from them, this was made quite obvious by the dems moving right in many policies and stumping with Cheney of all people. If these people really gave a shit about appealing to their constituents, they would’ve listened to the damn voters. This is all beside the point as modern American voting IS NOT determined by the voting public, but much more powerful interests. If you really believed your vote was effecting something in this, or any other election in the past 20+ years, I have a bridge to sell you in the Sahara.

                • GreyAlien@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  You are making lot of sense, it’s like good cop / bad cop stuff. Democrats will play this game of redirecting the blame away from their lovely politicians but won’t hold them accountable for yet doing anything about anything…

                  It was a really educational thread, even makes me wondering if all those comments were organic, like some of these arguments were too stupid and detached to be real.