

OK, but be honest about it, your problem is the religion itself.


OK, but be honest about it, your problem is the religion itself.


I have many audio recordings of them not just saying “OK” is the problem


Trust me, I think they did everything they could to be as obnoxious as possible. Do audio record though


CBP is relentless in its mission to safeguard the nation’s borders and the privacy of all citizens. CBP’s biometric facial comparison technology is hosted within a secure cloud-based environment and does not store biographic data for any travelers. CBP retains U.S. citizen photos for no more than 12 hours after identity verification and only for continuity of operations purposes.
https://www.cbp.gov/travel/biometrics/privacy-policy
Is what they claim. What you saw may have been about non-citizens


They store the data from everytime you enter and exit the country. For citizens they claim to delete that data after a couple days- but I would not be too confident in that. So if you are a citizen ALWAYS opt out of biometric entry and exit. I’ve multiple times been told it is not an option, then being forced to wait 10 minutes- harassed about why I want to opt out, then it suddenly becomes an option. This is despite CBPs policy that you cannot be penalized for it. I have several audio recordings of this happening because I noticed how much of a pattern it was.


UK is now also doing the same


That’s how religion works. It tends to inform people’s morality
Then is an absolute monarch capitalist? It is fundamentally a different system to have a state merged with corporation as compared to have them divorced. To deny that is to be intentionally obtuse.


What the article is about


This I kinda don’t get, in that this is probably the most vanilla thing you’d expect to hear from basically anyone of any religion about their spouse not following it.


Did you see what he said?


Thats contrary to the basis of Islam and Christianity, which explicitly have always been about conversions.
Christians believe their God cares about and wants them to try to save everyone, they believe following the Christian God is the path to everlasting happiness, that’s where the evangelism comes from- even when it takes a cruel form it is at least in theory a good intent(in practice of course often not).
Muslims believe their God wants all people to recognize and submit to the truth of himself, and that spreading this message is a duty.
If the capitalists are in charge of the state, they are the state. So it is not privately owned, it is state owned, the state just doesn’t serve the populace. That’s not capitalism.
the large firms and key industries are overwhelmingly publicly owned and planned
To not too dissimilar an extent as modern Russia
the working class is in control of the state.
Do you believe this for North Korea? If so, why not Russia?
Except that is not the principle in either country. There are plenty of cases where the state is in principle in control, or actually in control. Russia, similar to other economies, such as fascist Italy or China is structured in such away where you can exist as a “private” company as long as you ultimately bow to the state. You could also put many of the gulf states into that club. If socialism is not “when government does stuff” then capitalism is not “when rich people”
But it does not meet the definition of capitalism you gave. I agree its also not entirely socialist. It’s almost like its not a binary, most economies are mixed. The US is also not purely capitalist.
you don’t believe in the Constitution, rule of law, or America.
Which party does?
I see what you’re saying but I think when you really get to know a person you’d be hard pressed to find two that overlap so much that theres nothing they can learn from each other.
No I agree completely, its just less interesting, and less opportunity.
In reality though, whether we mostly agree on most values(other than how they treat me and specific people I care about) does not have much of an impact in how I choose who date.
for example, human rights
The thing is, I think you, I, and basically everyone disagrees on what human rights are. It would be hard to date in much of the world if you believed in freedom of speech, or vice versa in other places.
they have to be able to see humanity in all
Again, I think in many places its hard to find people who do.
I don’t think its constructive for us to be a relationship if they don’t at least have the potential to get there.
I don’t see why someone having the same view of morality as me is necessary to have a relationship.
I didn’t say feudalism. Though I agree, but why is it different from capitalism?