If you want to argue then address the first three sentences rebutting your argument. If you want to express your feelings you address the personal. I gave you both options and you chose the latter. Consider me your free internet schizo therapist.

And even if he was, it was a minority of people who voted for him. Representative democracy my ass.

Wdym, he duties all the time in the oval office. You can practically smell it.

We still have crime too, better defund the police

That’s a non-sequitur. A group of people banding together to protect themselves is not automarically an *archy. Nor does it follow they are secretly in control. I think you are describing your own personal reality then the reality at large. Do women really control your life so much that you feel you are not in control of your own life? Can you cite an example for us to analyze?

Yes this impacts everyone and everyone should be concerned. But the solution is in mass politics, not in “electing” another death cult leader. The conservative framework is fundamentally unable to address this issue.

Edit: after watching the video I would say the title reflects her audience.

That’s the nature of patriarchy. Women are to be protected while most men are disposable.

Would you say women and men are targeted in equal proportions or that one group is targeted over the other based on “perceived value”? Like I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying, “yes, and”

That’s an ideal solution. The best solution is what works immediately and within your capabilities.

I mean, why do you think they are targeting women in the first place?

We need another Mamdani

At present, it is impossible to predict long-term technological developments and the evolution of consumer preferences.

Ah yes, it is impossible to know whether a consumer will still want faster Internet in the future. They could enjoy the retro experience of a dial up modem making noises when connecting.

Be sure to have a dash cam otherwise they will charge you with trying to run over an officer

“oh no, not again” 🤣

Selling a good thing like Medicare for all is a skills issue at this point. And if we keep hiring Democrats who lack that level of communication skills, then don’t blame the voters for failing to know what is at stake.

Does being blackmailed count?

I remember America before ICE, it was nice.

There’s “good enough” and then there’s “it worked on my machine that one time but everytime someone else runs the function we get a different result”

Voting for electability in the primaries is what gets us voting for the lesser of evils in the general.

Shout out to Schumer who said we would get 3x the votes from the GOP never trumpers by rejecting the left flank of the party.