• pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Everything is a remix, and most human remixes are slop.

      The difference with AI is that no AI remix is not slop.

      Today’s AI cannot meaningfully innovate, re-interpret, or reconsider.

      AI remixes are thoughtless - both figuratively and literally.

      Like many things in life, it has some use and value, but much less than it is currently being sold as.

    • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      There is a difference in looking at a painting or movie and getting inspiration from it and learning how to copy the technique, taking time to understand why the previous creator made their choices and taking your thoughtfully gained knowledge and putting that into your own work versus taking a camera and snapping a picture and calling it your own. It’s essentially a copyright free right click and copy paste.

      Ai is a legal way to steal and not feel guilty while not learning anything about the art you are stealing.

      • rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 days ago

        yea ai does it in a different way than humans do, i agree. altho i wouldnt say its equivalent to making a perfect copy of something. people wouldnt be using ai if that were all it did.

        im also not saying that ai art is as good or even close to as good as art made by humans with purpose and intention behind it, just that both are based on previous existing works in some form