• OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Well then they can have The Culture instead. Every citizen of the Culture has a big house, and gets to spend all day going to parties and doing extreme sports. Every citizen is as well off as a real world billionaire.

        Because they’re anarchists.

          • OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            The Minds don’t control society. One guy decided that Masaq’ Orbital’s badlands should be covered in pylons with a gondola network to travel between them using wind power. So he convinced a bunch of people to work with him, and they made it happen. Even though Masaq’ Hub doesn’t like the pylons.

            The Culture doesn’t control its citizens. They can do whatever they want. The Minds just help out.

            • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Huh, I thought it was made pretty clear that the power distribution in society is such that the minds run the whole show and more or less keep the humans around as pets out of good will.

              Kinda like if your dog wants to go for a walk, you can take it, but that doesn’t mean the dog is in charge

              • OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 hours ago

                The Minds don’t use fences or leashes. The Minds have more power, sure. They look after the factories and keep the trains running. But power doesn’t mean control in a society without coercion. The Culture doesn’t have laws.

      • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        The socialism part

        No shared leadership, no competent women, no non-white people then?

        Edit: those are the good parts about Star Trek as a show back then when it first aired and are still good.

      • 3dmvr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I semi enjoyed the recent shows, felt like discovery didnt have one competent man tho, giving all the male archetypes/tropes to woman was interesting, just kinda wanted one man to not be incompetent and an idiot for 5 seconds

        • 3dmvr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          if 13 year old me watched it I wouldve dropped it and never touched star trek again, why is it so hard to just go 50/50 actual equality in the far hopeful future, the animated show did it a lot better. Strange new worlds was a bit better for me to watcg too, but felt like the opposite issue from discovery.

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s called Star Trek.

      Yes of course. But these are geniuses at work arguing about incredibly stupid things so best leave them to it.

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “populism” happens because living conditions decline and the powers that be are unwilling or unable to address it. Why would that happen in a space-faring civilization with replicators?