Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) signaled in an interview with Axios on Monday that she would not support New York City Council member Chi Ossé in a primary challenge against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.).

Why it matters: Ocasio-Cortez is one of several high-profile progressives distancing from Ossé’s potential run, arguing that it is a distraction from New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s victory.

Ocasio-Cortez told Axios during a brief interview at the U.S. Capitol that she was “not aware” that Ossé was challenging.

“But,” she added, “I certainly don’t think a primary challenge to the leader is a good idea right now.”

  • AshMan85@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    None of you realize the democrat leaders are being accused of having no control over their people. If AOC speaks out they will label her the problem like they did with bernie.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Oh no the horror. The DNC which just betrayed Zohran Mamdani and refused to endorse him despite him winning the Democratic primary. We have to play nice with the people who play dirty.

      • AshMan85@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        40 minutes ago

        If she doesnt want them to go to the media blaming her than yeah, first time getting into politics huh? Lol

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          31 minutes ago

          Oh no not the “blame” for running opposition against the establishment ghouls. The horror. Nobody in the public would support that. Everyone loooves current DNC leadership.

          At least MTG strikes when she sees blood in the water.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Lefty Fundamentalist purity tests are what got us Trump in the first place

      How about lets win something before we dismantle our army

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Typical rightie division, demand leftists fall in line and back their shit choices time and time again but throw a fit and try to fuck over any actual leftists from winning at every step.

        How about you shut up and stop trying to dismantle us?

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        How about lets win something before we dismantle our army

        What do you do when the people getting protected are hindering those wins?

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Lefty Fundamentalist purity tests are

        …normal for the left. The conservatives fall in line, they say, but the progressives need to fall in love. They don’t follow a name with the loyalty of the cons, and they will bail if the character or progress of the current leader isn’t consistent – or if consensus on goals and direction isn’t there.

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s the shame of having ethics and integrity.

          If you remove it, you’re no better than them.

      • P1k1e@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Hurts to swallow but your right. The problem with Dems is they fail so consistently and intentionally that we never really win enough get out of this mindset

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    She certianly carries a lot of water for establishment dems for someone they call a progressive. She won’t even call for Schumer to be replaced, guess we should have seen this one coming.

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s because in the real world, you have to deal with reality, not only the couple of pet possibilities that people want to consider. I think AOC is the best shot that any decent person in the US has. She would if she could, but in the real world, these are not actual options.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        How living in the real world been working for her? Oh thats right they passed over giving her a more powerful position for a old man with terminal cancer who already left.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 minutes ago

          Leftists need to stop showing loyalty to a party that uses them and then throws them away.

          The DNC is not a viable path twoards the left.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Part of me agrees with this, part of me thinks that these people are too far into the weeds to know what’s possible. Change brings chaos. And when you’re at your stressful job with a shitty machine that you are constantly trying to keep running, eventually you reach a point where the thought of turning off the machine is unthinkable.

        From an outside perspective, it seems obvious. The machine is bad. We should get rid of it and try something different. But that concept is terrifying to the people who work on the machine. Turn it off? But they’ve spent years learning how to work with the machine! They know how to sometimes get the machine to do what they want! If they replace the machine with something else, what if they can’t figure out how to work the new system? Maybe someday they can replace the machine, but right now? In the middle of everything else? No, no, far too risky. Best to try to keep working with the same old machine.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Oh you and your reasonable explanations, with their rational basis in organizational communications.

        I’m a PoliSci major and I’m baked AF! Now who knows more?!

    • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Oh good, more purity tests. That’ll surely defeat the fascist machine, thoroughly vetting every single thing a candidate does until we’re left waiting for the literal Jesus to return.

        • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Because your “valid criticism” is someone else’s “line crossed”, and there we lost another voter.

          Democrats have to fall in love, republicans only need to fall in line. That and rampant cheating via gerrymandering allow the minority to continue to fuck our country.

            • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              I’m implying that perhaps criticism can wait until the fascist threat is nullified. Division helps no one but Temu Hitler - let’s focus on putting him in the grave he deserves, then we can spend our time levying valid criticism at the other side when there isn’t Nazi Gestapo kidnapping brown people off the streets.

              I dunno, maybe it’s just me, but priorities. If you’ve got time to bitch about AOC’s failings, it would be time better spent fighting fascism in any way you can.

              • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                47 minutes ago

                That’s the same thing as saying you can’t critisize them. Just admit you want your own version of fasicm at this point where people can only critisize the politicians you deem safe to critisize. You’re not gonna get rid of red fasicms with blue fascism.

                • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  38 minutes ago

                  “Wait until the fire is under control to bitch about your taxes”

                  Is not the same as

                  “Don’t bitch about your taxes.”

                  This is fascism as it’s defined, not as one feels. It’s an easy differentiation to make if you put in 6 seconds of effort.

                  You don’t have to agree with me, but you should remain as intellectually honest as you can manage.

                  Just admit you’d rather bitch about something safe than resist in any way shape or form, it’s no more shameful than your selective understanding.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I was thinking, why does it matter what AOC or Mamdani or anyone says?

      Shouldn’t people just vote for who they want to vote for?

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago
    • Progressive Change Campaign Committee head Adam Green told Politico"it is not the right moment to launch a primary challenge against Hakeem Jeffries."\
    • Mamdani also appeared to discourage his fellow Democratic Socialists of America member on Monday.
    • “I believe that there are many ways right here in New York City to both deliver on an affordability agenda and take on the authoritarian administration in the White House,” Mamdani told reporters of Ossé.

    Yeah let’s hear all about how Mamdani exists to be controlled opposition, and how his choices are so fucking questionable lately, and how he’s only driving mainstream liberals back to the Democratic party.

    C’mon Tankiejerks. If you trash AOC but can’t find the courage to also trash Mamdani, you’re worthless. So let’s hear it. He’s sold out! In two weeks! Booooourgeois!

    No? Crickets as usual from the refuseniks? How odd.

    Seriously the more shit i see in here the more I wonder how wrong a strategy it is to tack to the center. The so-called-left can’t win a goddamned participation trophy ffs. We have to put a stake in MAGAs heart in less than a year and this kind of garbage only puts us further away from that.

    At least RTFA. The ragebait trap caught a bunch of people.

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      That looks more like Jeff Coltin’s contribution to what Mandani said. Mamdani did the very politician thing and said ‘there are many ways’. Jeff is adding in the discouragement and the ‘but’ to Mamdani’s quote.

      That might have something to do with it.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Stop being a divisive wrecker and forcing your purity tests on leftists.

      Either fall in line or go away, this is a critical time and we cannot have you righties around trying to wreck our momentum because you’re okay with a little bit of genocide.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Stop being a divisive wrecker and forcing your purity tests on leftists.

        Oh that is rich

        Either fall in line or go away, this is a critical time and we cannot have you righties around trying to wreck our momentum

        No YOU righties stop trying to wreck our momentum because you’re okay with not having a single national presence to point to and perfect is just fine being the enemy of the good.

        Feel free to address the hypocrisy I called out w/r/t the article or - as i fully expect - don’t.

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    AOC is making some questionable calls lately. Is she getting ‘bought’ out and into the party mainstream?

    And a distraction from a victory? What the fuck AOC? What does that even mean, his victory isn’t important now. It’s already happened, we need to focus on the ‘next’ part. And if anything that energy should be used to help get another leftist (and ally of Mamdani) into power, because that would support Mamdani much more than your political suicide here is.

    • thanks AV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You definitely shouldn’t critically analyze any of the positions aoc has held since being elected because then you would be a tankie /s

      In short, this is exactly who aoc is. She has been the party mainstream for years and exists to funnel left wing voters back into the democratic party.

      This was always her position in the party. No need to be bought out or manipulated. This is her role.

      kamala harris is working tirelessly for a ceasefire in gaza

      How she still has any credibility as a “leftist” after this is mind boggling

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Agreed. I think it comes more from the fact that she just can’t afford to follow the rising tide of the incoming left’s hard anti-Zionist policies, being a NYC state rep.

      She’s much more secure being a social liberal in a moderate party than a moderate Zionist in a truly leftist party. If anti-Zionism ever did become the party policy of the Dems, she would have to make some difficult choices facing her constituency in NYC.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Clearly the majority of the people in this thread are not basing their world view in reality. God forbid an employee will not openly talk bad about a coworker in an interview to the world. It’s like y’all have no idea how politics works.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’m pleasantly surprised about how many people realize that a ‘progressive’ should not be actively trying to keep one of the biggest AIPAC recipients in power.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s like you don’t. It’s the people who vote, not her coworkers. She needs to be taking them into consideration not her peers.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        She is. She’s one of the few people fighting for us. Y’all are asking her to commit career suicide for literally no reason. You have never even heard of Osse.

  • evenglow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ocasio-Cortez told Axios during a brief interview at the U.S. Capitol that she was “not aware” that Ossé was challenging Jeffries.

    Ossé filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission on Monday