I’d think it’d be easy enough to check - take these suspect ballots and make sure the people are alive, and then see if they say they voted. Get more than 10 that say they didn’t, and we’re off to the races.
It doesn’t say. It does also mention
Maricopa County AZ, seems to be the source of the vast majority, perhaps nearly all, of the AZ bullet ballot voters for Trump. If these ballots were introduced it would require co-conspirators working inside the tabulation center.
Which - is at least believable.
First of all, fuck the Guardian; the best thing they ever did was leave X. They’ve been carrying water for the center-right as much as the left for a long time (American Granuiad that is, I dunno about the other one)
Secondly - BULLSHIT. YOU FUCKERS HAD THE CHANCE TO SAVE EARTH AND YOU DIDN’T. Don’t give me that “ignored the working poor” bullshit. FUCK OFF. Just because you see an opening to jam your moral high horse up the asshole of the election conversation YET AGAIN doesn’t mean you’re right any more than it ever did. We lost the chance to help the working poor. The working poor chose that? Fuck. They’re as evenly split as you arrogant bastards that had college paid for.
THE STAKES WERE THUS: SURVIVAL OR EXTINCTION. If you’re arguing that the Harris campaign insufficiently convinced enough mouth-breathing fucksticks not to vote for extinction, you’re wasting your time.
You non-republiQan fuckers didn’t show up. Plain and simple. So shut the fuck up about it. You suck, we’re all gonna die, the end.
When Mr. Musk announced his $1M lottery for people to go online and sign a pledge to vote for Trump, I became personally suspicious of why such a promotion would be done. I signed up to see what information he wanted and what the pledge actually stated. He did not want to know people’s socials or send them texts. To sign up you had to provide your street address. That was all they cared about. Once they had the people’s names, and street address this would allow for building a pool of ghost voters who could logically be marked for fake ballots, structured in a manner which matched ePollBook and precinct data.
Elmo surely wouldn’t try such a thing.
The tell: A historically absurd number of Trump-only bullet ballots or undervote ballots.
There are always a handful of voters who cast a vote in one race which they care about, and do not make other selections on the ballot. These are called bullet ballots. In Presidential Races since 1980, these bullet ballots rarely account for more than 1% of the total votes including in Mr. Trump’s winning 2016 election and losing 2020 election, and when they do it warrants further investigation. In 2024 in the 43 non-swing states, bullet ballots make up a nominal >1%. In the seven swing states the numbers are so high to be unbelievable, unprecedented and demanding of further investigation. Here is analysis from totals as of late Nov. 12th
Here are the unprecedented results of drop-offs in the two western swing states:
AZ - 123K+ 7.2%+ of Trump’s total vote. Enough to reverse the outcome.
NV - 43K+ 5.5%+ of Trump’s total vote. Enough to exceed recount threshold.
It is my belief these two states have illegally added votes.
For comparison, examine Trump’s 2024 results in three states which border AZ and NV. They have equally passionate Trump supporters, but have the normal levels of drop off or bullet ballots.
ID <2K 0.03% of Trump’s total.
OR <4K 0.05% of Trump’s total
UT <1K 0.01% of Trump’s total.
In the case of Idaho and Utah, Mr. Trump was a run-away winner and had no need to add votes. In the case of Oregon, Ms. Harris was a run-away winner and adding votes to Trump’s total would add risk without adding value.
The same pattern of large numbers of drop-off votes or bullet ballots exists in the totals of MI, NC, PA, WI.
123,000 Arizonans voted only for President & nobody else? That is weird.
Speaker Johnson can go fuck himself.
Dammit Bunny, I’m if fippl . . grangka . . siff . . oh man.
After all, Why shouldn’t I?
Yes! Ha ha!
That was 2016/17 pretty much. Ending more-or-less with the million woman march.
corporate news: o noes! our revenue-per-click is dropping! Quickly, put some left-baiting headlines up! Go! go! go!
Fair point.
Vince McMahon, wife Linda ignored sexual abuse of ex-WWE ‘ring boys’,
bombshellsingle tiny firecracker suit claims
I mean - this ain’t about no wrasslin, this about corrupt-as-fuck fascists living above the law like the kings they believe themselves to be.
As a Junkyard Dog man, I took that personally.
Yeah but after watching all that - turns out they were really happy and lurved each other real good.
Y’all just hating on Keiko. “She broke up The Enterprise” you say. Bah. Lies!
Oh wow I didn’t know he was still alive. That’s great.
Nah, brah, nah. See, I already did all this. In 2016-2024. I did my hitch.
Trump says something bizarre, offensive, and deeply outrageous - the world reacts, and the cycle repeats every 24 hours.
They literally ripped children out of the arms of their parents, put them in freezing cages, then lost them in the system and they haven’t seen their parents since. That’s about as evil as anyone needs to be to buy a shovel to the face and here these absolute fuckwits elected him again.
Nah. Peace. When the camps spin up, I’ll be in the trenches with everyone else but until then - I’m setting healthy boundaries for myself. No trumps.
If I get weak or curious and just have to dig into the insanity it’ll be there. That’s a guarantee.
This line of thinking is misguided at best, utter bullshit and a cynical poke in the eye at worst.
The reason a demented corrupt rapist sociopath won is media.
Propaganda, if you prefer. Fixing it entails a complete overhaul of our corporate media system. It requires education on media literacy, when we can’t even say gay or teach about slavery.
Are there improvements to be made in the DNC platform? Absolutely. Always. Are some Democratic politicians useless for resistance? Hell yes, and they should be metaphorically pelted with rocks and garbage.
But this “why did democrats lose - lets look at the messaging” is UTTER HORSESHIT. Wrong. Engaging in that conversation is to miss the point entirely - which is exactly what corporate media would prefer that you do.