Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) signaled in an interview with Axios on Monday that she would not support New York City Council member Chi Ossé in a primary challenge against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.).

Why it matters: Ocasio-Cortez is one of several high-profile progressives distancing from Ossé’s potential run, arguing that it is a distraction from New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s victory.

Ocasio-Cortez told Axios during a brief interview at the U.S. Capitol that she was “not aware” that Ossé was challenging.

“But,” she added, “I certainly don’t think a primary challenge to the leader is a good idea right now.”

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    She certianly carries a lot of water for establishment dems for someone they call a progressive. She won’t even call for Schumer to be replaced, guess we should have seen this one coming.

    • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Oh good, more purity tests. That’ll surely defeat the fascist machine, thoroughly vetting every single thing a candidate does until we’re left waiting for the literal Jesus to return.

        • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Because your “valid criticism” is someone else’s “line crossed”, and there we lost another voter.

          Democrats have to fall in love, republicans only need to fall in line. That and rampant cheating via gerrymandering allow the minority to continue to fuck our country.

            • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              I’m implying that perhaps criticism can wait until the fascist threat is nullified. Division helps no one but Temu Hitler - let’s focus on putting him in the grave he deserves, then we can spend our time levying valid criticism at the other side when there isn’t Nazi Gestapo kidnapping brown people off the streets.

              I dunno, maybe it’s just me, but priorities. If you’ve got time to bitch about AOC’s failings, it would be time better spent fighting fascism in any way you can.

              • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                55 minutes ago

                That’s the same thing as saying you can’t critisize them. Just admit you want your own version of fasicm at this point where people can only critisize the politicians you deem safe to critisize. You’re not gonna get rid of red fasicms with blue fascism.

                • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  46 minutes ago

                  “Wait until the fire is under control to bitch about your taxes”

                  Is not the same as

                  “Don’t bitch about your taxes.”

                  This is fascism as it’s defined, not as one feels. It’s an easy differentiation to make if you put in 6 seconds of effort.

                  You don’t have to agree with me, but you should remain as intellectually honest as you can manage.

                  Just admit you’d rather bitch about something safe than resist in any way shape or form, it’s no more shameful than your selective understanding.

                  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    46 minutes ago

                    The fires been going for 10 years now so effectively it is. Stop trying to curb free speech, that will NEVER make fascim go away. It’s literally the antitheses of fighting fascism.

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s because in the real world, you have to deal with reality, not only the couple of pet possibilities that people want to consider. I think AOC is the best shot that any decent person in the US has. She would if she could, but in the real world, these are not actual options.

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        How living in the real world been working for her? Oh thats right they passed over giving her a more powerful position for a old man with terminal cancer who already left.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 minutes ago

          Leftists need to stop showing loyalty to a party that uses them and then throws them away.

          The DNC is not a viable path twoards the left.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Part of me agrees with this, part of me thinks that these people are too far into the weeds to know what’s possible. Change brings chaos. And when you’re at your stressful job with a shitty machine that you are constantly trying to keep running, eventually you reach a point where the thought of turning off the machine is unthinkable.

        From an outside perspective, it seems obvious. The machine is bad. We should get rid of it and try something different. But that concept is terrifying to the people who work on the machine. Turn it off? But they’ve spent years learning how to work with the machine! They know how to sometimes get the machine to do what they want! If they replace the machine with something else, what if they can’t figure out how to work the new system? Maybe someday they can replace the machine, but right now? In the middle of everything else? No, no, far too risky. Best to try to keep working with the same old machine.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh you and your reasonable explanations, with their rational basis in organizational communications.

        I’m a PoliSci major and I’m baked AF! Now who knows more?!