Didn’t one politician this year try to stand up to AIPAC and end up losing to an incredibly well-funded opponent? If so it would definitely have a chilling effect.

Are you me?

This guy wouldn’t use an S to pluralize “e-mail”. The UK school system didn’t leave children behind.

But … It’s an increase, right?

Are we okay with incremental improvements, or will only big bang headline news story type improvements be okay?

passerby

No.

passersby

NO.

Passers-by.

Yes. That’s the one that is valid at all.

https://archive.org/details/annotation-2024-10-02-133019

His hand is a render glitch as per the norm.

Everytime

Not a word.

not voting is in no way similar to a vote for

They’ve shown that with lower turnout, conservatives have a better chance of winning, just based on the way the parties work. Voter apathy is higher in progressives, as their need to feel okay about the entirety of a candidate means they suffer a lot more ennui with an imperfect candidate.

So Not voting is aiding one party a little more than the other.

Why, if this keeps up, Mr Miller could write a stern letter, and we don’t want that.

So he’s not a fan of apartheid per se but just hates Iran and feels the victims of Iran’s oppression of women - ie Persians - need to suffer for not taking state-orchestrated mass murder lying down?

One wonders what that guy is thinking sometimes.

https://archive.ph/ycMb2

Sorry; maybe try again and think of some other cases?

Tangential, agenda-ridden, off-topic.

Only a sith deals in absolutes.

If they can get the liens in place quickly enough, it can apply before he has to sell his stuff to pay for legal penalties.

If I have to pay a deposit to my landlord, they need to pay a deposit to the owner of the land they’re on.

It should be enough to either fully remediate the land back to the state it was in before the rental, or to support a lawsuit to compel that remediation.

PER WELL.

That’s cheese to feed the city.

Maybe stop. Then we can get to the trial over the pager terrorism and this can be all done, and we can focus on reparations for the other belligerent invasion (and 60 years of cruelty, ha ha, just kidding).

Thank you for correcting me in such a condescending way.

That’s an assumption. Am I psychic?

Not everyone is a native speaker, doesn’t mean I don’t speak English.

Non-native speakers usually write English really well. Should I know your background and education and your intent like I’m psychic, or should I hope everyone does something correctly and look toward that as a goal?

Sorry I didn’t measure up to the next layer of goalposts!

would’ve went

Maybe just “would’ve gone”, if I’m speaking English.

Or are you suggesting to genocide Israelis

I think one can stop propping them up and emboldening them to attack every neighbouring country on the shittiest of sham pretexts, and prevent their repeated belligerent invasions of other sovereign nations without going as far as actually attacking them back, let-fucking-alone going all the way to genocide.

That’s a bit of a leap, don’t ya think? I’ve seen goalposts move, but that’s a little ridiculous.