When we turn our back and ignore their suffering Israel wins by getting free reign to slaughter.
When we turn our back and ignore their suffering Israel wins by getting free reign to slaughter.
No the solution will take a long time to fix and undo the damages done to Palestine.
Removing Israel is the start of that process. You can’t begin to rebuild the house while it’s still on fire.
No.
Israel wants to kill every Palestinian. They don’t give a fuck about Hamas beyond being another thing to blame for their own wrongdoings.
“Oh it was the Hummus tunnels that made me strap a baby to my jeep as an human shield and shoot an elderly lady to steal her house!”
The only terrorists in Germany allowed to procure weapons are Israel.
Good thing it wasn’t as Putin has shown Russia is still a threat to innocent nations who aren’t protected by NATO membership.
Just a reminder that Israel has targeted food aid multiple times this year.
If the food is piling up, it’s because Israel has killed them people who could distribute it and will shoot anyone who tries to.
End terrorism, end Israel.
Israel is a terror state, armed and funded by the US.
The difference between non-ML tankie communism and anarchism is the means of getting there.
Communists want a vanguard state to slowly whittle away.
Anarchists want to skip that step.
There is literally death, suffering, and we’re heading towards some sort of fucked up techno feudalism today. Like we don’t need a revolution for that, that’s the path we’re currently heading towards without one.
Revolution isn’t pretty but just as when we overthrew monarchs, the end result and saving of future lives justifies it.
Good. The system is fucked.
Let it collapse and we can work on a new system without hundreds of years of entrenched rich elites deciding it.
You mean global north/ global south.
Developing and developed are considered negatively.
But in terms of laypeople words, that are used every day, 1st and 3rd world mean the same thing.
You’re thinking of ML tankies.
Communism is a stateless, classless, system where people enact mutualism and socialism without state coercion.
… Riiiightio
Yes and what about it?
Socialists would be in favour of state ownership of resources.
Anarchists and communists wouldn’t be in favour of a state.
What do progressives value about state ownership of utils, are they for it, against it?
TIL: Way too many people think it’s still the Cold War. Language changes people.
Nope that was apparently too confusing, now we say global north and global south.
It’s a much better system, see Australia in the south of the globe, is in the global north for instance. It just makes perfect sense.
What, progressives are in favour of state owned utils or aren’t? Explain yourself properly.
I am not sure why this is the case.
Because Lemmy was created by leftists having their communities banned from reddit. It is and always will be a leftist platform, same as whatever garbage Trump made will be a right wing platform.
Yes. It’s an American term used to describe those who are in opposition to conservative views. It’s not an ideology.
But please, tell me what being a progressive values compared to any other leftist. What makes a progressive different from a anarchist, communist, or a dem soc who have defined values and beliefs?
Russia shoots a school in Ukraine and our governments rightfully vilify and condemn them.
Israel shoots a school and we pull out the cheque book and ask how much they would like.