Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) signaled in an interview with Axios on Monday that she would not support New York City Council member Chi Ossé in a primary challenge against House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.).

Why it matters: Ocasio-Cortez is one of several high-profile progressives distancing from Ossé’s potential run, arguing that it is a distraction from New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani’s victory.

Ocasio-Cortez told Axios during a brief interview at the U.S. Capitol that she was “not aware” that Ossé was challenging.

“But,” she added, “I certainly don’t think a primary challenge to the leader is a good idea right now.”

  • Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    AOC is making some questionable calls lately. Is she getting ‘bought’ out and into the party mainstream?

    And a distraction from a victory? What the fuck AOC? What does that even mean, his victory isn’t important now. It’s already happened, we need to focus on the ‘next’ part. And if anything that energy should be used to help get another leftist (and ally of Mamdani) into power, because that would support Mamdani much more than your political suicide here is.

    • thanks AV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You definitely shouldn’t critically analyze any of the positions aoc has held since being elected because then you would be a tankie /s

      In short, this is exactly who aoc is. She has been the party mainstream for years and exists to funnel left wing voters back into the democratic party.

      This was always her position in the party. No need to be bought out or manipulated. This is her role.

      kamala harris is working tirelessly for a ceasefire in gaza

      How she still has any credibility as a “leftist” after this is mind boggling

    • defunct_punk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Agreed. I think it comes more from the fact that she just can’t afford to follow the rising tide of the incoming left’s hard anti-Zionist policies, being a NYC state rep.

      She’s much more secure being a social liberal in a moderate party than a moderate Zionist in a truly leftist party. If anti-Zionism ever did become the party policy of the Dems, she would have to make some difficult choices facing her constituency in NYC.