Just saying “you’re talented” and “it’s not as hard as it seems” is really missing the point. 90% of “talent” is really just persistent work. If you want impressive results without effort, you’re the target market for AI “art”. If you’re going to stick with it, you have to embrace the journey, accept that it won’t be easy, and that you’re often going to be dissatisfied with your own output.
Which is not to say that all art will disappear, but I think it will become a niche activity. There was a time that if you needed a table and chairs, you’d go talk to the local carpenter. Carpentry was a major job sector. Now there are cheaper and faster options. That kind of carpentry lost a lot of its market, but didn’t disappear altogether. I think the same goes for art. Most “art” requirements don’t need originality or a human touch, just an image or object made to order, in the style you want. That’s lost to AI, and that’s just the way it is. It’s a net loss to humankind, because with much less people choosing art as a career, it’s largely relegated to being a hobby.
Yes, but both the ability to stick with something and the speed of learning are highly variant per person. Even though I somewhat agree with the point, the image still feels pretentious as hell to me because it just assumes everyone will have the same experience learning to draw as the artist of that image did.
I interpreted that part as ironic, i.e. “just learn to draw you can do it too” isn’t exactly some insane revelation, so making it advice from superman is probably meant to ridicule the idea that being able to draw is some godgiven ability (like supermans).
Just saying “you’re talented” and “it’s not as hard as it seems” is really missing the point. 90% of “talent” is really just persistent work. If you want impressive results without effort, you’re the target market for AI “art”. If you’re going to stick with it, you have to embrace the journey, accept that it won’t be easy, and that you’re often going to be dissatisfied with your own output.
Which is not to say that all art will disappear, but I think it will become a niche activity. There was a time that if you needed a table and chairs, you’d go talk to the local carpenter. Carpentry was a major job sector. Now there are cheaper and faster options. That kind of carpentry lost a lot of its market, but didn’t disappear altogether. I think the same goes for art. Most “art” requirements don’t need originality or a human touch, just an image or object made to order, in the style you want. That’s lost to AI, and that’s just the way it is. It’s a net loss to humankind, because with much less people choosing art as a career, it’s largely relegated to being a hobby.
Yes, but both the ability to stick with something and the speed of learning are highly variant per person. Even though I somewhat agree with the point, the image still feels pretentious as hell to me because it just assumes everyone will have the same experience learning to draw as the artist of that image did.
Also self inserting as superman is kinda wild.
It assigns such a high authority to the speaker that it immediately comes off as pretentious/corny.
I interpreted that part as ironic, i.e. “just learn to draw you can do it too” isn’t exactly some insane revelation, so making it advice from superman is probably meant to ridicule the idea that being able to draw is some godgiven ability (like supermans).
Poe’s law strikes again