Either you read my original point, or you keep circling the pot and resorting to red herrings and straw-men because your fallacious ass is not rational enough to reply to the heart of the matter which I presented in my original comment.
Enjoy your little echo bubble chamber, so your liwwle feewings don’t get hurt as you get left behind by people using those tools.
nothing about jobs. just petulance.
Not even necessarily because they’re better than you, but because management values them and people who use them, and therefore you’re choosing to leave yourself at an irrational disadvantage for no fucking reason.
nothing about jobs. just ranting about management values and disadvantages based on management perception.
management is the context to your argument. the argument is that AI is desired by management. zero mentions of jobs and is wholely supported by a vague sense of “management”. doing what? who knows.
the argument lacks specificity and coherence. the original comment is less about actual debating and contains more content about attacking anyone who disagrees with a pro-AI stance.
it’s actually really sad that I have to explain basic reading and comprehension skills to what I assume are adults. I learned this kind of stuff in like 4th and 5th grade, but education in the world is anything but consistent so I can’t fault anyone personally.
We finally agree on something.
and yet you still fail to explain your point.
either you don’t have a point or you’re unable to communicate due to extensive AI brain rot.
which is it?
Either you read my original point, or you keep circling the pot and resorting to red herrings and straw-men because your fallacious ass is not rational enough to reply to the heart of the matter which I presented in my original comment.
nothing about jobs. just petulance.
nothing about jobs. just ranting about management values and disadvantages based on management perception.
couldn’t have said it better myself.
Do you think management grows on trees or something?
has AI made everyone’s brain mush?
I use the term “argument” here loosely.
management is the context to your argument. the argument is that AI is desired by management. zero mentions of jobs and is wholely supported by a vague sense of “management”. doing what? who knows.
the argument lacks specificity and coherence. the original comment is less about actual debating and contains more content about attacking anyone who disagrees with a pro-AI stance.
it’s actually really sad that I have to explain basic reading and comprehension skills to what I assume are adults. I learned this kind of stuff in like 4th and 5th grade, but education in the world is anything but consistent so I can’t fault anyone personally.