• Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Seem to be mixed opinions of this here.

    I’m of the opinion sex workers should not be criminals and need protections, but sex work should not be encouraged. A longterm goal of reducing it through improvement of the conditions and targeting causes is what I would prefer.

    Balancing that is never going to be easy but seems right.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It’s just really difficult to say what’s right to do with something like Only Fans. I think it makes getting into sex work far too easy and far too normalised, on top of creating a massive corporation that has a vested interest in normalising sex work in society and is actively using professional marketing and other methods to achieve that.

        It seems heavy handed to shut down something so many sex workers obviously rely on but at the same time I can’t see how you would handle it otherwise? Maybe a smoking approach would work? Rather than outright prohibition you could make laws banning the advertising of services related to sex work, banning branded advertising, banning visible brands, etc etc. Force it into the dark. Individual sex workers wouldn’t be affected by this much but a large company built on sex work like Only Fans would be targetable. This would probably kill the business’ ability to exist at all though so it’s possibly the same thing as banning it but through a more detached method.

        • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think a huge problem is how it exists on social media in the most exploitative way possible, which has driven demand way up.

          I literally cannot scroll Instagram without being shown onlyfans girls. The algorithm has sensed I am a young man, and as such I need BBL’s on my feed. It’s in short formats too, with optimised attention-catching editing/text/structure or whatever. It’s insane that it exists on an app which so many children use, and it’s insane that so much of it can be served up alongside normal content.

          • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah it is absolutely everywhere and in that regard I don’t fault China’s analysis that some have translated as saying it is a “disease”.

            It has contributed MASSIVELY to a rise in sex work in my opinion, but finding information on that is a mess because of the muddied terminology between compensated sex activities vs pornographic sex work. I think we can all at least agree an increase in sex work is not a good thing and aiming not to increase the population of sex workers who are in the massive majority women.

            • MaoTheLawn [any, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Yeah there’s defo been an explosion of it, and i suppose it’s better that the pornstars have more autonomy over their body/work than they would on porn sets of the past where the abuse is rampant, but at the same time it’s sad how easy it is to just start posting on it and how normalised it’s become.

              I’ve known quite a few people to do it for some extra money - that they didn’t even necessarily need - because they figured they’re a sex positive person and don’t mind doing the minimum level of taking nude pictures for money - but soon enough they realised that it can be a very degrading process, and you get all sorts of weird people from your past suddenly watching your ‘content’ and it doesn’t feel good. And then it’s out there online, and someone’s got those pictures to do whatever they want with.

              At the end of the day it’s also still exploitative in a literal labour sense because Onlyfans takes a big cut.

    • MolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      4 days ago

      The UK government just outlawed every not-just-softcore-porn site but gaming mod sites, blogs that feature alcohol, lots ofremoved crisis & LGBTQ+ advice sites, and more if you don’t pay for government ID & then upload it to a dodgy, unrelgulated third party company.

      Meanwhile we’re arresting people for literally any and all support or reference to Palestine under terrorism laws, while actual racist mob pogroms go on.

      We are so far past petty “authoritarianism”.

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      illegal-to-say

      malcolm-checks

      ukkk

      • SchillMenaker [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        Left field take: I prefer that weird British softcore style much more than the standard gonzo LOOK AT THE PENETRATION style. Even though everyone is still acting it feels more natural even accounting for those insane accents.

        • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 days ago

          that weird British softcore style

          Ew; the dialogue would be all “cor blimey, well have a shifter at dis luv, oi bin practicin’ yeah? Oi bin thinkin’ yeah? We call dis 'avin a hot crumpet yeah? We iz wiv da boys all noight yeah? We iz 'avin a lauf and 'avin a bo’ol a wo’a yeah? Cor blimey”

        • LaughingLion [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          i miss when you searched for “amateur” and it was a couple with a fetish for being watched with a camcorder in their bedroom. sure there are no fancy camera angles but at least the people are really having sex and you can see they are super into each other

      • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t watch porn myself but if I didn’t already have a VPN, I’d immediately sign up for one hahaha. That’s insane.

  • AstroStelar [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    While the (re-)ban probably happened this article doesn’t link to any sources for its claims, which makes me suspicious about the claimed quotes by government officials about “Western moral decay” and whatnot.

  • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    4 days ago

    Probably the correct answer for the wrong reasons. Sex work (I assume) still exists in China, but OF seemed predatory for both the consumers and the models. My understanding of the platform is based on a small amount of info from a while back, but I’m guessing it’s only gotten worse since then.

    The only models that make noticeable money need to do A LOT to get to that point — there was (is) this weird impression that attractive women can just sell nudes and get out of having to do real work, but the reality is that OF is very competitive.

    For consumers, I’m pretty sure you need to enter a payment method just to make an account, even if you only want free content. That means they can hijack your body’s strongest urges to get you to buy more content. And then there’s the whole thing with 3rd parties catfishing people.

    Taken from the true_anon sub about this.

    • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      get out of having to do real work, but the reality is that OF is very competitive

      Define “real work” and have you seen the job market. All the qualifications and experience in the world can’t land you an “entry level” job. And if you do “qualify” it’s for shit pay and hours that will make you insane.

      • there was (is) this weird impression that attractive women can just

        It’s the impression, there’s an impression that sex work is just taking a picture of you naked in the mirror and making money, which is an impression and a misrepresentation of that field.

        • TraschcanOfIdeology [they/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Yeah you can’t be saying “se workers are workers and deserve rights” and 5 words later repeat the incel talking point that “sex workers don’t really do anything compared to a ‘real’ job”. You’re creating surplus value and being paid for your labor, it’s a real job in that sense. Not even under Graeber’s definition of a bullshit job is sex work not actual work.

          • la_tasalana_intissari_mata [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            I am saying the impression, the way it’s advertised, only fans advertising, the way they advertise it is that it’s simple work or no work at all.

            here I’ll analyze every word I gave
            “it’s the impression”
            impression: an idea, feeling, or opinion about something or someone, especially one formed without conscious thought or on the basis of little evidence.

            “an impression that sex work is just taking a picture of you naked in the mirror and making money”
            there is an idea based on the advertising done that doing only fans is simply just taking some pictures of yourself and getting paid a lot, which in reality there’s far more than that, yet no where did I state it’s not a real work.

            “which is an impression and a misrepresentation of that field.”
            I again say that the previous statement is an impression people have, an idea without basis, and a misrepresentation of that field
            misrepresentation: the action or offence of giving a false or misleading account of the nature of something.

    • gueybana [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Before OF, the avenues women had to monetize themselves were nearly non existent or leagues more dangerous than OF. I truly don’t see how the platform is exploitative of women, relatively speaking.

      • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        4 days ago

        Something like only the top 1% of performers make a livable wage, with an even smaller percent getting “retire at 23” money. While previous websites (like Backpage and Craigslist) were more exploitative/dangerous, OnlyFans and its knockoffs sell the illusion of a better lifestyle and easy money, when the reality is you’re making less than Uber drivers.

        And since anything on the internet is there forever, you can easily lose control of your content (which runs into issues like revenge porn, consent, etc.). We still live in a world that shames sex workers, so having all your stuff out there can impact future jobs. How much responsibility OnlyFans has to protect its creators’ content is still undecided like all gig work.

        It’s shitty that someone could post their nudes and make all of $50, never move up the ladder, move on to a different career, then get fired from their teaching job ten years later because those photos surfaced.

        This is also a very American-centric view on my part. Conditions and attitudes towards sex work are obviously going to be different in China. I do think making money on that platform isn’t as easy as advertised and misleads a lot of sex workers about how money is earned. They also don’t get health insurance/benefits, either, because it’s like Lyft and Doordash.

        • stink@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          I knew a girl who had an OF and made OK money out of it, enough to to pay rent while she was in college basically.

          There was still a reddit community dedicated to posting her photos, with multiple thousands of subscribers. She didn’t get paid for any of that traffic, and Reddit didn’t let her file a DMCA to take down a community dedicated to posting her stolen work.

          She had to file individual requests for each post that was on there, at least that was the case the last time I spoke to her.

          • LargeAdultRedBook [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            She didn’t get paid for any of that traffic, and Reddit didn’t let her file a DMCA to take down a community dedicated to posting her stolen work.

            She had to file individual requests for each post that was on there, at least that was the case the last time I spoke to her.

            Bro trust me. It’s totally not exploitative bro.

            • stink@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 days ago

              Nah some zionist stealing 30% of the $30 you made in subscription fees this month so he can donate it to the IOF is totally not exploiting you bro

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        4 days ago

        You could argue that it opened up the market a lot, bringing in women that wouldn’t otherwise do SW. That could also be because of the COVID economic crisis. There were a lot of women trapped in bad situations around 2020.

  • grandepequeno [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    I can’t fathom buying porn, like they could stop making porn right now and you’d have content for the rest of your life but your actually paying money to masturbate? It’s free

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I think this demands some heavy “no investigation, no right to speak” enforcement. If someone with an informed perspective on the material reality for Chinese sex workers has something to say about it, let them, but if people wanna make strong statements for or against by just assuming that their understanding of sex work in the West maps perfectly to China then we should have no patience for it.

            • Monstertruckenjoyer [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Kinda, yeah. Nationalizing the sex trade would be a good idea

              Existing in a banned form creates a black market for exploitation, allowing it in privatized form allows for the same thing but not illegal.

              just a part of human society we’ll have to figure out eventually

              • quarrk [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                just a part of human society we’ll have to figure out eventually

                Class society. Not human society.

                People sell sex for money when the alternative is starvation and/or homelessness

                If that wasn’t a concern (ie communism) then the coercive aspect would be gone

                • Dirt_Possum [she/her, undecided]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  There will always be people who enjoy providing sex as a kind of community service.

                  People sell sex for money when the alternative is starvation and/or homelessness

                  Yes. But this is true of labor in general. It doesn’t mean plumbers won’t exist under communism. They will just look very different than how they do now, they won’t do what they do because the alternative is poverty or death, but will do it because it feels good to be skilled at something and to use those skills to improve the lives of the people around them. It’s not a complete perfect 1:1 analogy (nothing ever is), since for example most people have sex though most people don’t do plumbing work (though it’s reasonable to expect plumbing work will be something more people know about and do on their own as well). But that doesn’t change the fact that there will be people who enjoy it, work to become skilled at it, and provide it like I said as a kind of community service. That service is still socially necessary labor. As another analogy, therapists will also probably be vastly less necessary under communism, but there will still need to be people specially trained in helping the members of the community that need or desire help with their emotional issues who will still seek the services of a therapist (trauma will always exist even if we can reduce its incidence a thousand fold by abolishing capitalism), and as such, that socially necessary role, that need in the community for therapy, will be provided by someone who fulfills that role for their community. There is no reason to think that sex work won’t be in the same sot of position as therapy - far less common or needed in a society that isn’t sick and twisted by capitalism, but still a role that some will seek and thus provide a service and benefit to society. Yet another analogy: There will always be exhibitionists who enjoy expressing their sexuality with groups of people who enjoy watching them do so. Just as there will always be actors who enjoy performing the act of story-telling by presenting themselves as a character in that story, and there will always be people who enjoy watching them do so. A socially necessary role.

                  So it really bothers me when people insist that someone like me who has had positive experiences doing sex work and who took pride in bringing joy to others via that labor “simply won’t exist in a communist society.” Well, we’ll see since communism has yet to be achieved and no one knows exactly what it will look like (something even Marx pointed out), but that we don’t know how a given current profession will manifest under communism is true of all professions. And under transitional socialism, you can be damn sure that sex work will still exist, especially considering it does in some form in every current AES country.

                • sodium_nitride [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  People sell sex for money when the alternative is starvation and/or homelessness there exists money

                  Prostitution literally can’t exist in a communist society. At best, you could exchange gifts for sex.

              • Dirt_Possum [she/her, undecided]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Right. I was only half joking, and the half that was tongue-in-cheek was only because it’s not very likely that’s how China would deal with it (though it would be funny and imo very cool if they did). I very much agree with you and if you’re curious what I think about it, see my reply to quarrk.

  • Evilphd666 [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Boo. no-fun-allowed

    The internet is for p0rn. Sex workers are legitimate workers. Social Order? Really? Getting off in your own room hurting no one in your own time is a threat to “National Morals” and “Social Order”?

    Didn’t know Incels were in charge. /s