• gueybana [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Before OF, the avenues women had to monetize themselves were nearly non existent or leagues more dangerous than OF. I truly don’t see how the platform is exploitative of women, relatively speaking.

    • Belly_Beanis [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 days ago

      Something like only the top 1% of performers make a livable wage, with an even smaller percent getting “retire at 23” money. While previous websites (like Backpage and Craigslist) were more exploitative/dangerous, OnlyFans and its knockoffs sell the illusion of a better lifestyle and easy money, when the reality is you’re making less than Uber drivers.

      And since anything on the internet is there forever, you can easily lose control of your content (which runs into issues like revenge porn, consent, etc.). We still live in a world that shames sex workers, so having all your stuff out there can impact future jobs. How much responsibility OnlyFans has to protect its creators’ content is still undecided like all gig work.

      It’s shitty that someone could post their nudes and make all of $50, never move up the ladder, move on to a different career, then get fired from their teaching job ten years later because those photos surfaced.

      This is also a very American-centric view on my part. Conditions and attitudes towards sex work are obviously going to be different in China. I do think making money on that platform isn’t as easy as advertised and misleads a lot of sex workers about how money is earned. They also don’t get health insurance/benefits, either, because it’s like Lyft and Doordash.

      • stink@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        I knew a girl who had an OF and made OK money out of it, enough to to pay rent while she was in college basically.

        There was still a reddit community dedicated to posting her photos, with multiple thousands of subscribers. She didn’t get paid for any of that traffic, and Reddit didn’t let her file a DMCA to take down a community dedicated to posting her stolen work.

        She had to file individual requests for each post that was on there, at least that was the case the last time I spoke to her.

        • LargeAdultRedBook [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          She didn’t get paid for any of that traffic, and Reddit didn’t let her file a DMCA to take down a community dedicated to posting her stolen work.

          She had to file individual requests for each post that was on there, at least that was the case the last time I spoke to her.

          Bro trust me. It’s totally not exploitative bro.

          • stink@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            Nah some zionist stealing 30% of the $30 you made in subscription fees this month so he can donate it to the IOF is totally not exploiting you bro

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 days ago

      You could argue that it opened up the market a lot, bringing in women that wouldn’t otherwise do SW. That could also be because of the COVID economic crisis. There were a lot of women trapped in bad situations around 2020.