But you weren’t calling out hypocrisy, you were just blindly defending AI even though I clearly stated both things were bad you still claimed it was hypocrisy.
You called out hypocrisy when I wasn’t being hypocritical. And then despite me pointing that out atleast 3 times now you are still blinding defending AI
This is what I replied to:
“Something that sucks is slightly less bad for the environment than something that also sucks. Wow very good argument”
Is there something else you are referring to that I missed?
You resort to insults because you have no defense for your argument.
And you replied calling me a hypocrite for liking one thing and disliking the other, despite me saying that both sucked?
“Great argument.” was sarcasm which implies you didn’t believe your earlier statement.
No, it implies it’s a bad defense of AI saying a bad thing isn’t as bad as another bad thing doesn’t negate that the first thing is bad.
Calling out hypocrisy isn’t a claim that one of the two bad things isn’t also bad.
But you weren’t calling out hypocrisy, you were just blindly defending AI even though I clearly stated both things were bad you still claimed it was hypocrisy.
I specifically called out hypocrisy! Over and over, that’s all I did in my response to you.
Actually read what I wrote.
You called out hypocrisy when I wasn’t being hypocritical. And then despite me pointing that out atleast 3 times now you are still blinding defending AI
You were defending the hypocritical point of view.