We are talking about access to information and you said that it should be granted to everyone without any limitations. How are we not talking about that information?
Unless you are to finally admit that there is different kind of information and different rules that we apply to them, We are talking about your nudes too.
When you finally admit that, then we can have a discussion about what rules we apply to information. Then we can talk about “public information”. Until then, I don’t know what to tell you.
You talked about information. Not public, not private, information.
Your responses heavily imply that you think public and private information should be treated differently, but you keep talking about how information should be free and open. So you are willing and believing that there are rules. So why shouldn’t public information be public information while not being allowed to use for e.g. ai without permission? You can allow copying and modifying of information without allowing e.g. it being used for ai training. You can make that rule, just like you can different rules for private information than for public information.
I really don’t understand what you don’t understand.
Put it out and it’s public. At that point it is folly to regulate. If personal information is taken and spread, the culprit has committed a crime but in my opinion the rest is folly. I thought it was obvious so I omitted the intensely self explanatory details
Oh so it is a crime! So you totally could make it illegal to use public information to train ai without consent. Making it really difficult to collect billions in funding. Thanks for the admission.
Not what we are talking about. But you know that. Do you want to explain how to police public information without it being folly?
We are talking about access to information and you said that it should be granted to everyone without any limitations. How are we not talking about that information?
Unless you are to finally admit that there is different kind of information and different rules that we apply to them, We are talking about your nudes too.
When you finally admit that, then we can have a discussion about what rules we apply to information. Then we can talk about “public information”. Until then, I don’t know what to tell you.
I work with ip and still think it is folly. Idk why you spam about private information, that’s not what anyone was asking or discussing about
You talked about information. Not public, not private, information.
Your responses heavily imply that you think public and private information should be treated differently, but you keep talking about how information should be free and open. So you are willing and believing that there are rules. So why shouldn’t public information be public information while not being allowed to use for e.g. ai without permission? You can allow copying and modifying of information without allowing e.g. it being used for ai training. You can make that rule, just like you can different rules for private information than for public information.
I really don’t understand what you don’t understand.
Put it out and it’s public. At that point it is folly to regulate. If personal information is taken and spread, the culprit has committed a crime but in my opinion the rest is folly. I thought it was obvious so I omitted the intensely self explanatory details
Oh so it is a crime! So you totally could make it illegal to use public information to train ai without consent. Making it really difficult to collect billions in funding. Thanks for the admission.