• Artwork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        Sorry, this is not the source. May I ask why do you share misinformation?
        Not only the article is an entirely different case, has no such chart, but the “clickable links” on the website are fake, too:

        • vapeloki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          I clicked all links. None of them are fake. So, what the shit are you talking about?

        • vapeloki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          That is the original source I know. The content describes the content of the graph. Where is this misinformation? What did I miss?

          • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            They’re complaining that the way “Source” in the image is highlighted implies it’s a clickable link, which of course it’s not.

            Despite that, whether the links in the text are highlighted depends on the browser (which is odd). Using Firefox Focus they are invisible but are highlighted in my stock Andoid browser.

            In Addition, the data in the text is global data, the data in the post is US only, so it’s not the source of the data of the post.

          • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            You missed the part about wp-image-4776.lazyautosizes.lazyloaded. This is a critical part of the lore, because it means the author of that page used WordPress, and is lazy.

      • Artwork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Thank you for the actual references, effort, and your stance shared regarding it!

        For the sake of your opinion on the environment impact, where you suggest to “stop eating animal products”, I am sorry, but I disagree. Water used for animals is a water used for a life, which is fair, adequate, and well, one of the main reasons water exists in the first place, I believe. Comparing that to a dead lifeless machinery to support? I do not believe this is a fair comparison.