• Carcharodonna [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    4 days ago

    Those 1920’s flapper girls sound amazing crush

    Not knowing how to play Bridge or do the Charleston really makes me feel like I need to step my game up.

    • TrashGoblin [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 days ago

      Bridge kind of sucks, though. It has an official set of rules for game play, but then an unofficial set of conventions for coded communication in the bidding phase that you have to learn separately. You can’t actually play the object level game, you have to play the meta. It is extremely neurotypical.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        Low-level bridge play requires quite a lot of intuition, but high-level play is very much the opposite. Top players have basically a phone book of what every bid, every play means, and expect their partners to follow it exactly. The only communication allowed is through numbers and cards, and they must precisely follow what you have. In competition play, if anyone makes a strange bid or plays a ‘weird’ card, you may stop play to ask their partner what they understand by that, and they must answer correctly or risk having points deducted by the adjudicator if they were perceived to have mislead. It’s very mathematical.

        Ironically, I quite enjoy playing with low-level players when it’s a laugh, but high-level players tend to start with OCD and build on top of that.

        • AernaLingus [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          In competition play, if anyone makes a strange bid or plays a ‘weird’ card, you may stop play to ask their partner what they understand by that, and they must answer correctly or risk having points deducted by the adjudicator if they were perceived to have mislead.

          Can you share an example of this? Sounds intriguing but I’m not sure what to search for (“bridge weird card (adjudicator)” ain’t it, apparently).

    • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, playing Bridge used to be cool. But people born after 1950 seem to have collectively decided to not play it anymore.

      • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        4 days ago

        Bridge’s predecessor Whist (or even earlier Trump) was the primary upper class gambling game for 300 years. If you read a book about someone losing the estate playing cards it was Bridge, not poker and probably not proto blackjack (which both existed in some form but were a bit lower class)

          • Mardoniush [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            There’s also Basset and Faro, which could be charitably described as “card roulette” except even less fair to the player in the former case.

            • Keld [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Quadrille was big for a while i think too. But really you want your trick-taking card games (Bridge etc.) for “game responsible for bringing down a dynasty stretching back to the middle ages”

  • SootySootySoot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 days ago

    This cultural change was largely driven by WWI. By finding a way to also get women to work they could much more efficiently contribute to the war effort. At the same time, expanding recently-industralised capitalism is looking to sell more stuff to more people. Coincidentally that got women involved in new and what were previously exclusively “male” pursuits.

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ok but crocheting and playing the zither at the same time is pretty impressive. And what’s the point of playing the zither if no one knows how to Charleston? Sounds like these two ladies should hang out with each other more, they’d probably have a great time together.