

I think you accidentally the link
https://harpers.org/archive/2025/11/the-goon-squad-daniel-kolitz-porn-masturbation-loneliness/
edit: btw @frogloom@hexbear.net, you should be able to edit the post to add the link


Thanks for doing the extra legwork—there’s a lot of great studies in there!


I also saw a post that showed that these things send about 20 GIGABYTES of telemetry every month. Absolute clown shit.
edit: Found a source! This person actually had 30 GB/month.


Can anyone find the actual study? The fact that I couldn’t easily find it myself and the disclaimer that “This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies” makes me suspicious this might have been fabricated out of whole cloth by an LLM.


I’m good enough at Japanese now that I can read flame wars in VTuber clip comments without translation…truly the height of cultural immersion


You jest, but I saw someone posting screenshots from Gray’s Anatomy with AI slop medical diagrams that had completely incorrect anatomy and incomprehensible labels. Boggles the mind.


Holy shit, he died?! Dude was so young…


Thank you so much!! Now that you’ve found the PDF, I’ll also include the article that links to it, since it’s helpful to have more information about its provenance when linking it to someone:
https://punchbowl.news/archive/punchbowl-news-am-2-25-22/
Here’s a memo that has been making the rounds among House and Senate Democratic campaigns and consultants for the last week or so. And the reason this memo caught our eye is that it’s from Impact Research, a well-known Democratic firm that also happens to be where President Joe Biden’s pollster works.
John Anzalone is the founder of Impact Research, as well as being pollster for Biden’s victorious 2020 presidential campaign. We’ll note right now that the memo isn’t his, and it’s not the White House’s position.
But Molly Murphy and Bryan Stryker, who wrote the Feb. 15 memo — we’ve been sitting on it for a few days because of the Ukraine crisis, sorry — certainly have tapped into the mood of Democratic campaign pros, who see disaster in November unless the party figures out a better message on Covid.
Here’s the opening paragraph of their memo:
“After two years that necessitated lockdowns, travel bans, school closures, mask mandates, and nearly a million deaths, nearly every American finally has the tools to protect themselves from this virus. It’s time for Democrats to take credit for ending the COVID crisis phase of the COVID war, point to important victories like vaccine distribution and providing economic stability to Americans, and fully enter the rebuilding phase that comes after any war.”
And here are the bullet points:
· “Declare the crisis phase of COVID over and push for feeling and acting more normal.”
· “Recognize that people are ‘worn out’ and feeling real harm from the years-long restrictions and take their side.”
· “Acknowledge COVID still exists and likely will for a long time.”
· “Don’t set ‘COVID zero’ as the victory condition.”
· “Stop talking about restrictions and the unknown future ahead.”
Biden administration sources have told us they plan to talk about turning a corner on Covid during the State of the Union, so clearly they share some of these thoughts.
This debate in Democratic campaign circles comes as blue state governors are relaxing Covid restrictions. The CDC is preparing to ease indoor mask guidelines today, according to the AP.—
And even though it’s not what I asked for, the article about the governors in particular putting pressure on the Biden admin is still useful context, especially since it’s got a quote from a partner from the same polling firm.
(also @solrize@lemmy.ml—the letter has been found, but thank you for your offer!)


Thanks, I really appreciate it!! 
I’ve gotten pretty good at bookmarking and cataloging my COVID information in the last year or so, but unfortunately I wasn’t so fastidious in 2022. Probably not surprising that my keeping tabs on COVID narrative stuff is inversely proportional to how jokerfied I’ve become about how politicians, the media, and the public talk (or don’t talk) about COVID 


Mega mega THREAD THREAD 


A top biomedical scientist has left the United States for China after giving up millions of dollars in research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
After studying and working in the US for 22 years, Hu “Tony” Ye, who held the prestigious chair professor position at Tulane University in New Orleans, left to take on the role of founding dean at the new school of biomedical engineering at his alma mater, Tsinghua University.
Hu has long focused on the rapid detection of viruses, publishing numerous papers in top-tier journals and serving as the associate editor of ACS Nano journal.
Hu has applied for more than 30 patents in the field of nanomedicine, 14 of which have been authorised by American or international companies, and is a co-founder of four biotech start-up companies in the United States.
Just months before he left the US, he commented publicly on freezes and cuts to NIH funding.
He said a US$3.7 million NIH grant affected by the cuts had been allocated for the early detection of tuberculosis and HIV in children.
Additionally, US$3.1 million of NIH funding had been designated to develop blood-based cancer detection technologies and US$1.5 million was allocated to procure state-of-the-art equipment to further disease detection, cancer research and medical technology development.
On April 7, Hu published an open letter on the Tulane University website, titled “Preserving life-saving research: the crucial impact of NIH funding on public health”, writing that cuts to NIH funding would have a widespread impact on scientific research.
“Now is the time to raise our voices, to protect our research and our future. If we miss this moment, we may never get another chance – no one will be spared,” Hu wrote in the letter which he also posted to his LinkedIn profile and commented on.
“Proposed federal budget cuts could slash indirect cost reimbursements for NIH grants from 53 per cent to 15 per cent.”
On October 10, according to publicly available information from Tsinghua University, Hu returned to China as founding dean of the newly established school of biomedical engineering. He was also appointed the Zhao-Yi endowed professor at Tsinghua.
The South China Morning Post reached out to Hu for comment earlier this week, and he clarified the open letter during an interview on Friday.
“NIH has maintained full support for my research group in the United States without any funding cuts,” Hu said.
“I joined Tsinghua University full-time not because of the reduction in NIH funding.
“All of my NIH funding - several million dollars - left in the US has now been transferred to other Tulane University professors to continue the project, without any interference from NIH. I also informed my project manager about my return to China, and they all understood.”
Hu graduated in 1999 from the college of chemistry and chemical engineering at Lanzhou University in Gansu province, majoring in organic chemistry.
He quickly stood out at Lanzhou, as one of just 10 students graduating with honours out of 2,000, before pursuing a master’s degree in the department of chemistry at Tsinghua University.
After graduating in 2003, he studied biomedical engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, where he obtained a master’s degree in 2005 and a doctorate in 2009.
From 2009 to 2011, he conducted postdoctoral research at the University of Texas Health Science Centre in Houston.
During academic lectures, Hu often mentioned the period following his doctoral studies when he met a group of children in Italy who had developed Aids. He said their suffering motivated him to develop technologies to quickly detect infections related to Aids and tuberculosis.
According to estimates by the World Health Organization in 2024, around 10.8 million people worldwide contract tuberculosis each year. Around 1.25 million die from the disease, many of whom succumb because of undiagnosed conditions or late diagnoses that render them incurable.
Additionally, one-third of the global population is infected with the tuberculosis bacillus but does not develop the disease. Researching new diagnostic methods and improving existing ones has become an urgent priority.
Hu developed a new method that enriches tuberculosis peptide antigens in human blood using nanoparticles, which are then detected with a mass spectrometer. Compared to commonly used diagnostic methods that require four to six weeks, the new method can shorten the diagnostic time to 2½ hours, with laboratory costs of around US$3 per test.
From 2011 to 2015, Hu was an assistant professor in the nanomedicine department at Houston Methodist Research Institute, while concurrently holding the position of assistant professor in the department of cell biology at Weill Cornell Medical College. In November 2015, he was promoted to associate professor.
In July 2019, he joined Tulane University medical school as the Weatherhead chair professor.
Celia S. Weatherhead, a Tulane alumna and a major donor to the university, established the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Diagnostics where Hu was the second director.
In January 2021, his laboratory at Tulane University developed a rapid Covid-19 testing kit. This kit, which used saliva as the sample source instead of nasal swabs and could detect the Covid-19 virus and its variants, was more sensitive than nasopharyngeal swabs and could provide results in 15 minutes using a smartphone.
In January 2024, the journal Nature published an article titled “Tracking down tuberculosis”, which mentioned seven potential new tuberculosis screening technologies, three of which were developed by Hu’s lab.
According to the Tsinghua University website, before Hu’s return to China, his laboratory received long-term funding from institutions such as the US Department of Defence, NIH, the Gates Foundation and WHO.
In June, the Association of Diagnostics and Laboratory Medicine in the US awarded Hu its 2025 academy award for outstanding contributions to clinical chemistry in a selected area of research. The award recognises clinical chemists whose pioneering research efforts have placed them among the world’s foremost experts in their fields.
However, Hu stated in an open letter in April that, “without proper funding, those solutions may never reach the people who need them most”.


Dude seems absolutely addicted to “do big thing, number go up.” We just need to convince him that the biggest things he could be doing are pressing the communism button and doing massive record-breaking infrastructure projects. Make a YouTube video about eliminating homelessness by seizing property from landlords! Another one about building transcontinental high-speed rail!


Looks like you’re missing the link:
https://archive.is/20251019213613/https://www.ft.com/content/7960c6aa-dbfa-4a55-91e8-ae44601842ec


From the linked New York Times article:
In a statement on social media, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made no mention of any friction with his four-star commander. “On behalf of the Department of War,” said Mr. Hegseth, using the name of the department he now prefers, “we extend our deepest gratitude to Admiral Alvin Holsey for his more than 37 years of distinguished service to our nation as he plans to retire at year’s end.”
Very funny that the Times insists on calling him Defense Secretary and tut-tutting about the name change when the military is indiscriminately blowing people out of the water. Yup, sounds like defense to me! God forbid we besmirch the integrity of The Institutions™.


last line is off by one syllable

(your title matches though, thank heavens!)


Implication? Where’s the fun in that?!
Seriously, though, my only exposure to this subculture is through one-liner memes of people talking about their cum stacks, and it’s such an absurd concept that it’s never stopped being funny to me. I could read the article—I’m sure it’s good—but in this case I prefer to stay blissfully ignorant and leave it in the realm of imagination.
https://xcancel.com/beanytuesday/status/1981406667817570566