I keep finding clips of him on twitter and the man was absolutely vile; I never watched his stuff before, watching it now I see he really was a hateful piece of trash.

I’m not shedding a tear over someone taking out the trash.

  • JohnBrownsBawdy [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Remember: for a healthy democracy, it is important for those that hold views like his to be loved, lionized, and be given massive media exposure. It is very harmful to a democracy for anyone to mock or be critical of such a person or that person’s views.

  • dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    1 day ago

    His whole debate schtick was fake. All of media is saying that he encouraged discussion or welcomed people to politics, none of which is true. Charlie manufactured scenarios where he could bully unprepared people to promote far right propaganda.

    He sits in a booth with a microphone to present himself as the expert, giving him advantage in the conversation. He chooses unprepared college students from campus who are between classes. Then if someone proves that he’s wrong, he just won’t upload the video. There was no real debates.

    • AF_R [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The weirdest part is how the majority of people look at his debates, watch the whole thing, and conclude Kirk won.

      Like, literally the second last thing he said was “too many” in response to how many trans mass shooters there were? How is that an acceptable response in a scholarly debate?

    • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Media bias” has been a marketing strategy for Fox news for a while now, but it is especially grating to see all the hogs whinging about how he was a victim of unfair reporting in light of his own tactics.

  • Crikeste [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s a fuckin reason his blown out neck is the back ground of my phone: It’s a beautiful sight when Nazis die. Brings a smile to my face every time.

      • Crikeste [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I’ve had to watch Palestinian children get blasted to pieces for almost 2 years now. Yes, America is a dark and violent country, and FOR ONCE, that violence came home, not to some other child like it usually does, but to someone who was perpetuating that very killing of children, in both instances. Someone who DESERVED it.

        Sorry if my celebration is distasteful to you, but any empathy you have toward the situation is distasteful to me.

        • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Honestly watching him argue so vehemently in defense of the genocide, and to mock the suffering people, I have zero pity for him and no empathy for his wife who chose him and wants to continue his legacy.

          Ive said it before and I’ll say it again: racism is weaponized childishness. The man insisted on behaving like a hateful manchild, and people needed support, not this manchild running cover for their hardship and misery.

          Zero pity for him, moreso for the worms feasting on him and getting a crap meal.

    • AF_R [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And the comedy, that he was killed for not being bigoted enough

      I officially #disavow accelerationism but man the ongoing world events since 1991 are not good for my ego

  • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah the dude hated black people, thought the Civil Rights Act was a mistake and that black people were better off under slavery. He also was a major source of the anti-vaxx bullshit. He was such a vile human being, 100% deserved what he got.

  • pinkapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s definitely going to be a good piece tracking his history sooner or later but he wasn’t just some random far right streamer. He popped up basically out of nowhere in 2012 when he was 18, had donors that helped him fund TPUSA. I faintly remember that he had some vague association with the Tea Party and it was primarily libertarians spamming quotes of him, very astroturfed popularity. I’m not entirely sure but he may have been the first one doing this debate libs, trigger libs then post the vid grift and Shapiro followed as another “conservative youth”.

    It’s nuts to say this but I suspect that this was a GOP strategy to get young voters after Ron Paul accidentally became a meme on 4chan and gained some half-ironic following there. Kirk, Shapiro etc were basically provocateurs for hire with extreme positions but their views shifted depending on who was funding them. Part of the Koch Bros online agitator ecosystem. He wasn’t religious until much later when he had an “awakening” and I think he didn’t support Trump at first either.

    ToiletpaperUSA on reddit has good stuff on his history. These people including Crowder, Molyneux etc were fringe shockjocks for pay and floated to the surface during the gamergate and Trump’s 2016 campaign. It’s hard to believe they got to be GOP media frontliners and so prominent that one would get assassinated like that because they all started as an intentionally extreme opposition to radlib woke SJWs etc and nobody took them very seriously.

    If anyone tracks or remembers the rhetoric strategies of the Trump and Clinton campaigns back in 2016 and sees how initially fringe debate assholes like Charlie Kirk were positioned then the whole republican to fascist groupshift will become far more clear. Wild that it took less than a decade. I don’t think this trend will decline post Trump.

    • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Shapiro predates Kirk by almost a decade and is the true inventor of the genre. He was funded directly by republican donors (I forget which) whereas Kirk was in-house brand GOP.

      I think Molyneux and Crowder also predate Kirk but by less.

  • CleverOleg [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m convinced this is all just white evangelicals who have had a massive persecution fetish finally being allowed to cum over it. This is what they have been longing for for my entire life: getting to pretend one of their own was martyred for his faith.

    I don’t want to link to it, but check out the music video for “I Pledge Allegiance to the Lamb”, the last part especially, to get an idea of what I’m talking about. I remember putting on a play in church to that song where all us Christians were being arrested for our faith. After all these years they finally have their release 💦

    Edit: fun fact, Ray Boltz (who sung the song I mentioned above) came out as gay later in life, and I think mellowed out a lot but not sure.

  • BelieveRevolt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 day ago

    It really sucks that that asshole got so much publicity from being luigi-dance’d. He wasn’t even close to the top of the chud debatelord totem pole, but now people worldwide are supposed to know him and weep over his death.

  • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 day ago

    He also just wasn’t even that good of a debater. I’ll never understand why people are so stoked about this guy.

    • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because he yelled at those they thought were uppity, like women and black people, in places they were afraid to go to (ie college campuses)

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah but Ben Shapiro does that all the time and doesnt fail as hard as Kirk. Even crowder was arguably better at what he was doing. And they’re all parroting the same shit pile talking points.

        • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Ben Shapiro’s gimmick is talking really fast so you can’t understand wtf he’s trying to say, and if you ever ask a clarifying question or try to untangle his word salad he moves on and pretends that means he “won”

          Which granted is a more effective strategy than Charlie Kirk’s, but it’s not particularly advanced

  • Hohsia [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is this bullshit seriously still in the news cycle? Has to be on the top of the most manufactured news stories I swear to god