• jaschen306@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Visited Bologna about 8 years ago and visited these towers. There was a ton of supports at the base to keep it from falling down and even then it was still leaning pretty hard.

    I met some Italians that doesn’t care about it and think it’s a waste of money.

  • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    There’s San Gimignano left of you want to get a real life feel of how it was. The town lies on an important route and local families showed off by showing their massive dongs of towers.

  • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Is this an AI image? Stop that.

    I say that because some towers are leaning weirdly, and some windows are very diffused. It’s too low res to be to an “artistic renderin,” and it’s just looks messy (as an image). I’ve seen better renders of the towers of Bologna.

    If it’s not AI, I’ll across out the top bir. I’m sorry I’m just super skeptical nowadays.

  • qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The only Italian town of towers I recognize is “San Gimignano”. Shoutout to AC2.

  • witty_username@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    24 hours ago

    “The reasons for the construction of so many towers are not clear. One hypothesis is that the richest families used them for offensive/defensive purposes during the period of the investiture Controversy”

      • clif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That was actually one of the reasons I learned. The rich families wanted to show how rich they were so they built towers. Then other rich families built their own, preferably bigger, to show that they had a bigger penis more money.

        Are there any facts to back that up? I don’t know. I heard it ~25 years ago and I don’t remember the source. Though, I was in Bologna around that time so possibly from a tour or possibly from some drunk guy at a party.

        • ugo@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I don’t need a source to believe it. Humans are humans, and rich fucks always want to one up each other. Be it via who has the biggest rocket, mansion, boat, or, in the 12th century, tower.

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Or horse. I wonder what the 12th century equivalent of a modified tailpipe was?

              • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                17 hours ago

                Those are words I’ve never seen, thanks. I guess I can see that, imagine some smelly poor showing up on a nag in a burlap caparison then some medieval influencer on a Percheron with a purple silk caparison pulls up alongside? All the fair maidens faint right there!

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        22 hours ago

        It’s not about height, it’s about girth. You need a properly wide base and taper in order to please house so many soldiers.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Obviously they were there to guard the cost-saving but insecurely designed trench leading to the small exhaust port.

  • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Seems like it would be a nightmare to take them down. Demolition back then must have been pretty methodical, taking it apart from the top to bottom.