When you have blocked someone, and they comment on your post, do they come to your front door and start yelling?
Are they standing across the road with a large, vulgar sign?
Do you get a phone call?
Do you in any way get notified?
Can you even see their comment?
If you answer “no” to the above, then you are left alone. They are no longer your concern. If you’re still concerned, then that’s a problem in your head.
But they are leaving you alone. You can’t see their comment if you blocked them. They could be screaming like a monkey with rabies and you’ll never notice.
If the idea that they can still comment bothers you, then you indeed want to punish them, rather than just ignore them.
You want to do something ethical with Spotify? Find a way to rip music from the platform. :)
Though preferably find a way to pay the artists in a more direct way. Especially if they’re smaller artists.
It doesn’t, which is refreshing. A lot of personal ego and insecurity is tied to those that care about how many upvotes they have.
My concern is that something like OP posted just brings that crap over here, albeit not in an integrated fashion.
I don’t get it. Is this the Lemmy version of Reddit’s karma?
Fucking christ, imagine actively rubbing glucose, sucrose, and citric acid on your teeth.
What’s wrong with these people?
False advertising. There are way more than 15 beans in that bag!
Like, does it actually just have candy inside, or is it regular toothpaste with a candy flavour?
If you look into the history of Chris Roberts you’ll know it’s not a scam. Roberts is one of the few creatives I’d say actually needs an executive board to hold him back, because he’ll never stop and actually finish something.
I don’t think there’s a single project Roberts has finished on his own accord. He has always been made to finish.
This wouldn’t end world hunger. This is what would happen long before the robot even reaches the floor of the UN:
To end world hunger you don’t need to invent infinite food. You need to end capitalism.
D. They all, individually, have superpowers and predicted a disaster would happen. However, their future vision is predicated on the fact that they’ll all be on the plane. Them all choosing not to go will have significantly altered the outcome of a potential future event.
In short; you’re probably safe.
You know, I actually don’t think it’ll be a good idea to kill people who are only powerful because they can talk. The more I think about it, the more I think they’ll be turned into martyrs by their followers. It’ll only embolden them.
So, something that really upsets the world in a tangible way would be…
Shooting more CEOs. And bankers.
What an insane and unprecedented surprise.
Andrew Tate, though that may be dangerous as he’ll probably turn into a martyr.
What? Don’t you guys have money?
Oh this is brilliant!
Not this again…
Ah, OK. Thank you, England, for helping to create a far more clear definition of “genocide”.
Now I understand that, when a leader says “they deserve to all die” openly on national news, while actively carpet bombing them, it doesn’t mean they have an intent to destroy a certain group.
Looking back I realise how very silly it was to mistake something so direct and obvious as genocide.
Oh no! The potential that someone is mocking me, behind my back, without me witnessing or knowing it, really keeps me awake at night!
I mean, really. If you’ve gone so far as to block someone, do you even care that they’re mocking you?
If so, why? And are you aware that someone can mock you, or spread crap about you behind your back, without explicitly needing the ability to comment on your threads?