The nuclear scientists were killed using a special weapon whose details were barred from publication, Channel 12 says.

The 10th nuclear scientist was killed shortly after the other nine, as part of the overnight Thursday-Friday Israeli operation, which included strikes on Iran’s ballistic missile program and the Natanz nuclear site, along with the elimination of top members of the Islamic Republic’s military leadership, the network says.

The nuclear scientists were all killed while they were sleeping in their beds, with Israel deciding to carry out the assassinations simultaneously so that there wouldn’t be time to tip off those being targeted.

The scientists apparently believed they were safe from such targeting in their homes, a senior Israeli official tells Channel 12, noting that previously assassinated nuclear scientists were killed while heading to their cars after work.

Israel had been tracking Iranian nuclear scientists for years and the ten killed last week were marked for assassination in November of last year, Channel 12 says.

Just when I feel like dystopian news can’t really disturb me anymore…

Leaving this totally unrelated article about Palantir and Israel here for absolutely no reason at all…

How Israel Uses AI in Gaza—And What It Might Mean for the Future of Warfare:

A program known as “The Gospel” generates suggestions for buildings and structures militants may be operating in. “Lavender” is programmed to identify suspected members of Hamas and other armed groups for assassination, from commanders all the way down to foot soldiers. “Where’s Daddy?” reportedly follows their movements by tracking their phones in order to target them—often to their homes, where their presence is regarded as confirmation of their identity. The air strike that follows might kill everyone in the target’s family, if not everyone in the apartment building.

Abraham, whose report relies on conversations with six Israeli intelligence officers with first-hand experience in Gaza operations after Oct. 7, quoted targeting officers as saying they found themselves deferring to the Lavender program, despite knowing that it produces incorrect targeting suggestions in roughly 10% of cases.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    They are flying jets, using drones, and even small explosives. The homes of these scientists were severely damaged. The richest countries of the world are backing Israel.

    Is this just Israel putting out propaganda? These scientists thought they were safe at home. Sinister! Super secret weapon that blows up apartment buildings. Sounds revolutionary!

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    What is to stop the ultra wealthy from simply each making a million of these AI commanded drones, and just…killing all the poor? ALL of them? ALL OF US?!

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    the most dangerous.profession in the world has gotta be iranian nuclear scientist.

  • eletes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    I guess this is what they meant by they had something planned whether the US bombed Fordow or not

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago
    1. what a stupid fucking name
    2. why does Israel get to have nuclear weapons
    3. why does no one ask question 2
      • pineapplepizza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 hour ago

        In 1994, Ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons in exchange for security assurances from the United States, the United Kingdom, and Russia.

        • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          Typically, no one wants to die for stupid shit, especially when they are in the wrong. But when there is no consequences such as dying, a.k.a no nukes, why not go to war and take everything? There’s no morals between countries…unless enforced by nukes.

          This is why I’m pro nuclear armament of all countries.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        yeah but if Israel gets them the countries they keep bombing should also get to have them. the country that jerks off to 2A somehow doesn’t think so.

        • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          USA is at the core of the Western-Imperialist hedgemony & Israel, Japan & Pakistan gets to have them because they are Pro-Western imperialism

    • allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Unfortunately the answer is pretty simple. The USA and Israel are best buddies and if the USA says their buddy can have a nuclear arsenal who is going to stand up and tell them otherwise?

  • Tuxman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yet they didn’t know about preparation for the October 7th attack?

    Tinfoil hat mode: they let it happen to have a reason to raze Gaza to the ground.

    (Sorry, that’s my “Bush did 9/11” moment)

  • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Few things say “you need a nuke, you need it right now” like foreign states killing your scientists, in their beds in the dead of night

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t agree with Israel at all. But Iran is a theocratic ethnostate as well. One that has pretty loudly proclaimed that the day they have nuclear weapons is the day before they use one on Israel. There’s nobody out there who’s in a morally high position.

        • wpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          No Iran definitely has the moral high ground, by a fair margin. Israel has been committing a genocide, as well as running a full on apartheid ethnostate, if you didn’t know. But even if we ignore that, the IAEA as wel as the American intelligence community (think NSA, CIA and so on) have both assessed, as recently as a week ago, that Iran has not attempted to build nuclear weapons since 2003. Iran is being bombed, illegally, based on a lie. That’s high ground enough for me.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Theocracy yes, almost as badly as the zionists. Ethnostate no. You don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about, hazbarite.

            • Saleh@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              50 minutes ago

              When was the last time Iran invaded land to settle it with its own people?

              • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                43 minutes ago

                Yes, because iran is as bad in one single way as the zionists, they’re also as bad in all the other ways.

                Like how im a really shitty painter, so therefore im exactly as bad as hitler in everything.

                Im glad you understood precisely what i was saying there. Really helps my faith in humanity.

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          If I learned anything from the 2024 election it’s that we must unequivocally support the lesser evil. Since Israel attacked first (and is actively committing genocide), that means Iran is the lesser evil and therefore they are perfect and not supporting them means you support genocide. /s

  • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    This is state sanctioned mass murder. This is state terror attacks across a national border. This is so unethical and obviously illegal, I don’t know what else to say about it.

    We need to distance ourselves from Israel. We need to stop giving them weapons. Right now, the taxes I pay go partially to arming them, I am partially responsible, and this is not “ok”. I do not want to be doing this, I never wanted this…

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Right now, the taxes I pay go partially to arming them,

      And we are giving millions in contracts to Palantir to help them create these nightmare AI projects with zero oversight.

      Alex Karp’s biography makes it pretty clear he’s trying to spin this shit as every American’s patriotic duty to support, and no different than the Manhattan project (as if that’s something great to aspire to in the first fucking place) during WWII.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      state terror

      Yeah, the ‘protocols of the elders of zion’ larpers dont do anything else

      need to stop

      I think it’s a few years late for purely negative action to be useful here.

      We let this get too far out of hand. The question is: glass some LARPers, or world war 3? If the former is not on the table, the latter is inevitable.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I think it’s a few years late for purely negative action to be useful here.

        I actually disagree with that. If we end the flow of weapons and funding to Israel, we’d see a totally different behavior from Israel within the week.

        The question is: glass some LARPers, or world war 3? If the former is not on the table, the latter is inevitable.

        And this part, you’re saying nuke them or else WW3? That rhetoric is as bad as theirs! If you can’t think of any other solutions, then please, don’t be part of the solution.

    • SufferingSteve@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      But oh so lucrative, and with a catchy phrase…

      I see moneybags in this idea, wonder who will first make it a reality…

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It got more legal a few years ago, I think. Not explicitly “made legal”, but the legal foundations have been eroded. I.e. if you can expect to get away with something it is legal in a very real sense.

      It’s always been practically legal for empires like the US, Russia, China to commit any atrocities in weak countries, More and more countries are seeing how much they can get away with.

      Netanyahu tested the limits over and over and saw there were really quite few legal limits. With Gaza, he saw the limits didn’t actually exist at all.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I have mixed feelings - Gaza clearly shows a “worse way” to do warfare, but that doesn’t move the needle on how bad it is to say: “Welp, there’s a 90% chance that somewhere in this building is somebody associated with a group that we don’t like, so take it down tonight while everyone is home sleeping.”

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The thing is, until someone actually faces any consequences in modern times for atrocities such as these; simply saying how bad they are has become meaningless.

          • Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            It isn’t meaningless.

            It is not enough in itself and being like “well i said it, now all is done from my side” is problematic.

            Still it is important to call it out as a mean to pressure those with direct power to enact consequences to do so.

          • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I think it’s probably pretty hard to keep simultaneously assassinating 10 targets and their families under wraps, so they’re trying to get ahead of accusations by pretending it’s a show of military strength instead of horrifying skynet murder.

            It looks especially bad when they’re pointing the finger at Iran for fucking cluster bombs.

            The argument being cluster bombs are a dirty move, but using simultaneous AI powered assassin drones to strike while people are sleeping makes you the good guys?

            • theneverfox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The argument being cluster bombs are a dirty move, but using simultaneous AI powered assassin drones to strike while people are sleeping makes you the good guys?

              I mean… That is how this works. Cluster bombs are bad because they’re less precise and cause more collateral damage. So weapons that target individuals with high precision are better

              But like… Presumably, you’re not just individually killing a bunch of civilians precisely

              • Basic Glitch@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                But like… Presumably, you’re not just individually killing a bunch of civilians precisely

                No, they’re not precise at all unless you consider also killing their families and potentially an entire building full of people to be acceptable “precision.”

                That’s why it seems like bullshit to pretend lower tech cluster bombs are an inexcusable evil compared to Palantir AI drones.

                • theneverfox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  31 minutes ago

                  But that’s it exactly - cluster bombs just fling granades all over a city block at random. It’s basically just collateral damage in the hopes of hitting a soft target

                  I mean, fuck palantir and I really don’t like this tech in general, but blowing up a room or a house is way more precise. You’re hitting just what you mean to hit

                  And that’s what a lot of war crimes come down to - certain weapons are unacceptably imprecise. Which gets into the first rule of war crimes - you’re not supposed to attack noncombatants

                  Let’s not defend cluster bombs just because Israel is going to use this for justification…

                  Because of course they will, this whole thing started by blowing up the Iranian negotiator, they’re obviously not going to start acting in good faith now

  • martin4598@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Marking people for assassination looks normal to the times of Israel. Nice people.

  • kcweller@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s time to stop believing the lies of Israel’s might.

    They assassinated people in Tehran, they don’t have a special weapon that killed all of them simultaneously. The same lies about “special systems” like the iron dome being impenetrable has been their tactic to ensure pressure on their states.

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Special systems = indiscriminate bombing of residential building at night to maximize civilians murdered

    • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The country is funded by a supermacist colonial ideology. The population need to be dezionified and other country should do their obligations in stoping a genocidal state