I guess he’s rather going to cause BRReentry… :)

I say Yes!!

I mean, they are burning money like never before. And no emissions from these fires. Zero. Surely there must be some positive effect.

/s

Now you are trying to distract with so many other topics that do not belong here.

EOD for me.

Now you’re […]talking about tariffs.

Not at all.

You don’t need to have diversity between horseshit and non-horseshit.

That is only true in a very general way.

In this specific case it does not help you with critisizing the guardian, because then you would first require them to know (and to give a damn about) your personal estimation of what is “horseshit and non-horseshit” ;-)

You are right at the beginning, but wrong in several aspects towards the end of your comment.

the idea that Trump is competently executing on plans that can be laid out coherently is also laughable.

For example, think about the sheer amount of executive orders he has put out in his first few days of his second term. This must have been planned and prepared. It was not just some random sh*t. You may be underestimating him a lot if you only think of “insane” etc. It was for a purpose.

Why are they putting this in the newspaper? This is not the first totally insane pro-Trump story I have seen in The Guardian.

The world is much more than “pro or against trump”. They want diversity and they are doing well.

I can’t get the cables looking good

It’s because you plan and do cables in the early stages, not in the end stage, if you ever want it to look good.

The only thing I can think of now:

Powerful golden spray paint on all cables. Make it shine, make it look like it was all intended like this.

Surveillance is the obvious purpose of any robot dog.

If they are commercial calls, then NO.

In my country.

But maybe Europe simply does not want anymore.

Maybe this monetary “initiative” has been created exactly for this not wanting American weapons anymore.

Sell your photocamera. Quick.

There are still some films worth looking.

But will there be any then?

say universally the same avitar is applied to everyone while on trial.

The one and only “good” AI. Trustworthy for everybody?

I do not believe in that.

First you would need to decide on the one and only company to provide that AI. Then someone must prove that it is good and only good. Then it must be unhackable (and remain so while technology evolves).

All of this is hardly feasable.

but it is the U.S. that is heading back to the 1930s,

Just think one step further.
One little step.

US goes back to fascism. A little later Germany goes back to fascism.

Germany has a strong tradition in following the US with every shitty fashion …

the only thing that’s attempted to be bypassed, are biases related to his appearence and speech.IMO this concept could be the real future of trials if done right.

How do you know if it is done right or wrong?

It is fake, and it is a manipulative kind of fake.

You assume some honorable purpose, but that isn’t the only possible purpose.

Even “bypassing biases” would be a kind of manipulation, and you can never know what other manipulation is going on at the same time. It could exploit other biases. It could try other tricks that we are not evil enough to imagine, and it would be “better” at it than any real human.

Trump has long railed against free trade, which Musk expressed support for

Maybe that’s the topic that has separated these two?

With your Bluetooth you might get to a precision of a centimeter or a few millimeters.

But the computer mouse wants a precision of 1/100 of a millimeter. That’s why it has that optical sensor.

I don’t think you’d have any fun that way.

But, does he know? ;-)

I remember, in 2025, when the former Whitehouse got renamed into the now Honourable Foulhouse.

/s