Mike

Started playing Magic with Portal and Mirage. Currently play off-and-on Historic and Commander.

I love collecting older cards, and I’ve put together a full Portal set cube and about 20 thematic tribal decks with cards all from 2012 and earlier.

  • 184 Posts
  • 479 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle






  • MikeMAtoMTGThe Story of Ghazban Ogress, with Cathy Nicoloff
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I’m glad you posted this here, I saw a discussion a few days ago and the entire thing just disgusted me. I actually played when these cards came out but I never knew about this card or any of what this was. Now, in hindsight, it’s pretty ridiculous to me that Mark Rosewater pushed this thru to actually being printed. To print something like this, it has to go through numerous stages of review. He thought this was so funny and such a good “in joke” that he pushed it through. Never once apologized, and whenever was asked about this, he never said anything or apologized at all.

    NOW after this all comes out the guy issues an apology and owns it. That’s great and all, but what kind of a scumbag does this, especially someone in their 30s. He wasn’t a child, he was a grown adult working for a big game company. He even brought this card up on his drive to work podcast and never said anything about the true meaning behind the card. I have lost a lot of respect for Rosewater over the last few years but this is beyond sick.

    This is especially sick because this was done to a woman during a time when it was incredibly difficult for women to get into the game. A woman who just dared to “have a relationship” with other magic players. Done to someone who didn’t and couldn’t really speak up for herself given the overwhelming pressure of trying to fit into the group of magic players and the heightened position that Rosewater had at WoTC. All the more egregious to me.






  • MikeMAtoMTGThoughts on Spider-Man so far?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    It’s too bad we can’t see overall pre-release attendance by set but there was a reddit thread on the main subreddit about attendance. All if it anecdotal but it seems like it’s pretty down overall. I’m not surprised either, regardless of UB they totally half-assed this entire set. It was originally planned to be an aftermath style booster, like those 7 cards, and this is what we get when executive leadership decries 6 standard sets a year. Upper management is the only force possible to ruin this game.











  • I think its a huge loss to have those players leave MtG but at the same time, there is no real home for 1v1 competitive in Magic anymore. Locally here (Pennsylvania) it seems to be mostly Flesh and Blood and some Lorcana picking up those players, in Baltimore I noticed there was a huge growth in Sorcery. Maybe the diaspora will end up being a good thing overall, technically for as far Magic has swung towards casual play they could technically always swing the pendulum back towards competitive but I am laughing as I’m typing this out lol.


  • MikeOPMAtoMTGWoTC's comments on standard meta and bans
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    25 days ago

    To that end, we’re going to be more aggressive next year with the number of banned and restricted announcement windows and the timing, adding more. We’re still fiddling with that cadence, but our aim is to have one for each major set release (or close to that amount) to maintain a sense of predictability and avoid disruptions during play seasons. It’s not always possible to have that particular cake and eat it too, but we hear loud and clear that we don’t have enough windows of opportunity.

    We’re also going to slightly move up our previously announced banned and restricted announcement date from November 24 to November 10. This keeps the basic premise of not interfering with players who had planned their decks and travel for the Standard RCQ season while still moving up the announcement and giving players more time to prepare for the World Championships should something change.



  • MikeMAtoMTGWhat's with Echoing Deeps?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    I think it should always be avoided. Fortunately that one is somewhat subtle but I think it should never be done. The text should be the highest layer in the design file. I already think they took things too far with that bordered text on the FCA cards:

    This is nearly unreadable for me and it hurts my head to read it.






  • This is never going to stop until Hasbro/WoTC change their overall strategy. They’re catering 100% to casual commander, and are either actively or passively forcing competitive constructed formats into the ground.

    “You cannot serve two masters” is at play here and the two design philosophies are at odds with each other. It’s Vivi right now, it will be Electro in the next set. After that it will be something Avatar, etc etc etc.

    They have two options:

    1. Increase the power of cards/sets, specifically legendary creatures, to grow revenue but ruin competitive formats
    2. Decrease or maintain the power of cards/sets to save competitive formats but decrease (or risk decreasing) revenue

    Since WoTC no longer runs the business of Magic the game, they cannot do option #2 anymore which is what we saw with Masques block and all of the other lower powered sets that re-stabilized competitive formats.

    We are forever stuck with #1 until Hasbro sells WoTC.