• Sleepless One@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      IDK about natural languages, but his work has been useful in computing. We have him to thank for regex, for instance.

      • NoGodsNoMasters [they/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        i mean he’s been hugely influential in linguistics and it’d be dumb to pretend he hasn’t made contributions of value, but it’s fun to dunk on him and there’s definitely a fair bit that’s somewhat controversial and that i disagree with

        • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Without being at all versed in linguistics myself, can you share some of what he’s done in the field that you think is wrong or off the mark? I’m sure I can find some linguistics criticism of him on the web, but I’d be curious to read some criticism of Chomsky particularly from a hexbear’s perspective.

          edit: sorry, I only now saw that The_Jewish_Cuban already asked you the same question.

          • LaughingLion [any, any]@hexbear.net
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            So Chomsky’s theory, which currently holds true, is that only human beings can learn and use language. Don’t be confused by this: plenty of animals communicate. Language is much more than communication. Language has structure, grammatical rules, is affected by culture, and so much more. Animal communication may have one of these elements but as far as we know there are absolutely no animals that can use language or have ever used language; it is simply not something that can be taught to them. A few animals can mimic elements of language but they don’t really use it in any meaningful sense. They simply imitate and repeat and cannot interchange vocabulary to form new grammatically correct sentences and so on. There are many who have tried, such as teaching Koko the gorilla sign language, but ultimately have failed.

            Additionally, Chomsky says that because language is so ingrained into the human condition and we have literally evolved to use it, we don’t even have to “learn” it in the traditional sense. Language is acquired by human beings. We simply pick it up by hearing it. We don’t just pick up on the words, we pick up on the grammar, the idiosyncrasies, the exceptions to the grammar, the whole of it. This method of learning second and third languages is a concept that has really taken off in language learning communities in the past 20 years: the language acquisition method. So he kind of has a point here. Animals we have attempted to get to use language (and have failed) we have tried desperately to teach them. They simply cannot nor have ever acquired language. So we can’t teach it to them and they can’t acquire it despite half a century of people trying to prove Chomsky wrong.

        • Sleepless One@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sheila Adele Greibach (born 6 October 1939 in New York City) is an American researcher in formal languages in computing, automata, compiler theory and computer science. She is an Emeritus Professor of Computer Science at the University of California, Los Angeles, and notable work include working with Seymour Ginsburg and Michael A. Harrison in context-sensitive parsing using the stack automaton model.

          You learn something neg every day. I take it this is one among many instances of a man taking all the credit for something a woman played a much bigger part in creating/discovering?

      • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The Chomsky Hierarchy omits the recursive languages, which are one of the most useful and interesting.

    • The_Jewish_Cuban [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      What do you dislike about him linguistically? I’m only familiar with his contributions to generative grammar/language which seems pretty okay in my.understanding

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oof. You guys hate pretty hard on Chomsky. Whatever his faults (I’m sure they’re many), he brought a lot of anticapitalist and anti-imperialist messages to the (semi) mainstream. You may argue that he was allowed to do so as he wasn’t left enough, bur he was a big part of a lot of people’s journey (mine included). I say give him his due and leave it there, at least in terms of politics/philosophy. Recent revelations around is relationship with Epstein excluded!

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Most people here have a soft spot for him similar to Bernie Sanders. And he has some good work; people clown on him but ask around and people will still recommend him

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think part of why so many of us are harsh on him (and this goes for Bernie in recent years too) is precisely because of that soft spot. If only he could have been just ever so slightly better and told known child trafficker Jeffrey Epstein to piss off!