• @Evu
    link
    English
    35 days ago

    The announcement says turn 3 of game 3, but it means game 2. Their game 2 starts at about 5:30:15 of the official coverage, and the play in question happens at around 5:34:00. Twitch chatters catch the mistake immediately, and the commentators bring it up around 5:35:35.

  • @Evu
    link
    English
    35 days ago

    I could easily see myself doing something like this by mistake. I wonder what the judges heard when they interviewed the players that convinced them it was intentional.

    • @maino82@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yeah this seems like an easy mistake to make. In fact, they were on coverage, which means they would have had a judge sitting there at the table with them, so the judge even missed it when it happened.

      • @Evu
        link
        English
        55 days ago

        It’s not like they don’t know they’re on camera, and on top of that, Van Etten was up a game already. Who would intentionally cheat in a situation where you’re pretty much guaranteed to get caught, and you don’t even need the advantage that badly anyway? The only thing I can think of is that Van Etten told the judges “Yeah, I realized it a couple of turns later but didn’t say anything.”

        By the way, speaking as someone who’s played my share of paper Magic and made more than my share of judge calls: call the judges when this happens. Their top priority is to fix the game state, not to punish you. Sometimes if the game has progressed too far to fix, they’ll let the mistake stand. I don’t know offhand how enforcement differs at a high-level event like this, but I think there’s a real chance that Van Etten could have salvaged a match win out of this if he’d called the judges on himself in time.

        • Artemis
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          @Evu @maino82 I mentioned this to my friend who grinds modern PTQs (or whatever they’re called these days) and he said yeah that guy has a reputation for cheating.

          • @Evu
            link
            English
            34 days ago

            Well, if he’s cheated so much in the past that he can’t get the benefit of the doubt from the judges now, he won’t get a ton of sympathy from me either.

    • @MysticKetchup@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      44 days ago

      I thought so too but apparently the player in question has a history of cheating so I think they didn’t want to cut him any slack

      • @Evu
        link
        English
        44 days ago

        That’s valuable context, thanks.