They’re probably angling for more restrictions on Chinese cars in the US/Japan. Then they can enjoy their monopoly over the domestic market without having to actually invest anything to actually compete with Chinese auto companies

The issue is that ChatGPT will tell you that it can do those things. Most of the hype for “AI” has been predicated on treating it like actual artificial intelligence and not the LLM parrot it truly is

My understanding is that search on the microblogging side of the fedi is intended to be “broken” (from the view of someone expecting a Twitter-style search); hashtags are for opting-in to global discoverability whilst without them your posts are intended to be stumbled upon and/or passed around rather than sought out.

Search is broken beyond the choice of being an opt-in. The fact that there’s no way to sort search in any way except chronological order means it’s hard to find anything relevant. Instead it’s usually just a bunch of spam blogs or replies

Feeling like you’re faster just because you can generate easy, boilerplate code doesn’t actually mean you’re faster if it spits out junk or takes longer to debug/integrate that code, or if tasks require more complex work that LLMs are bad at.

I just wanted to see some concrete stats given how much everyone is implementing it and hyping it up, as anecdotal evidence is easily biased by shiny new toy syndrome.

Elon Musk? The guy who was begging to go to Epstein’s parties?

Sayonara Wild Hearts if you want a short but very cool musical game

the potential pace improvement through LLM assisted coding

Have we actually seen any evidence that LLM’s increase the pace of coding? Because in most of the reports I’ve seen there is no measurable difference even when users feel like they’re faster

I disabled updates on Nova for the time being but I really need to setup and install a new launcher

Sad but understandable. I wish him the best with his other work

1. This is way too brief and lacks any actual evidence for its argument
2. It doesn’t touch on the main argument of AI bubble forecasters: that AI costs a massive amount of money to develop and run but does not make nearly enough money to recoup that investment. And people don’t seem to be interested enough in AI to actually pay for it, especially given that the actual price will be very high

Well it’s a definite improvement from the Vivi meta. But man, almost every deck being Blue (and often Red) feels weird. Like even when they have some deck diversity it’s still not remotely color balanced. Are they really gonna be able to get Standard under control with so many sets and a 3 year rotation? Or is this just the new normal?

Wow yet another example of forcing AI into something that the AI just makes worse. Must be a day that ends in Y

1. This article likes to repeat itself a lot
2. Is this article actually about how the author didn’t like The Gilded Age?
3. Only showing critic reviews and not showing user reviews seems like less of an issue than the article presents, given that a quick glance at Rotten Tomatoes shows that critic and user scores tend to be pretty similar but critic scores are lower 9 times out of 10

What if the 2030s change the approach and use AI to teach everybody how to program?

What does AI (already known to be an unreliable bullshitting machine) provide to students that existing tutorials, videos and teachers do not already?

Also the companies investing in AI are not trying to teach their workers to be better, they’re trying to make more profit by replacing workers or artificially increasing their outputs. Teaching people to program is not what they care about

As a young child who didn’t yet know what Barbasol was, I was still a little disappointed to find out that the can was not, in fact, filled with delicious whipped cream

The thing is, they only need to successfully extort 3% of the font users to make a profit that way. And especially in text heavy games, it’s not easy to just quickly switch out a font without formatting/visual issues

It’s funny that they can never give actual concrete reasons to use it, just “it’s the future” or “you’re gonna get left behind” but they never back those up

Nice! Yeah I don’t mind a modest difficulty increase but some of the romhacks really don’t play well without super optimized teams of competitive mons

So the guy that spent half a year taking away lifesaving aid from starving people now says money is no big deal? Then why spend so much time cutting welfare programs?

That’s not even starting on the fact that current AI and robots are nowhere near the full automation level for the vast majority of necessary work.

What’s the rom hack? Gen 4 is one of the few Pokemon gens I haven’t played and I’ve wanted to do it with a Rom hack that fixes some of the old issues with it