Ms Rachel does the “for the children” stuff earnestly and righteously. She does a lot of charity and advocacy work for children. She’s been a big supporter of children in Gaza, the children of the Dilley detention center, and more recently she’s been calling for justice for Nolan Wells. Out of everyone who I’ve ever heard the “for the children” rhetoric, she means it.
It feels like I missed something… Although any “for the children” argument rases an eyebrow.
Ms Rachel does the “for the children” stuff earnestly and righteously. She does a lot of charity and advocacy work for children. She’s been a big supporter of children in Gaza, the children of the Dilley detention center, and more recently she’s been calling for justice for Nolan Wells. Out of everyone who I’ve ever heard the “for the children” rhetoric, she means it.
Oh here we go lmao
it’s right to be skeptical of “but think of the children”, especially when it’s coming from the mouth of Helen Lovejoy types.
what ms rachel does isn’t that.
You’re grasping at straws