• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        Both are quite secure but neither of them stop an idiot on one end or the other from sharing the contents with the public.

        • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 天前

          I always find it funny how many people fail to understand the “end to end” part of end to end encryption.

          If your endpoint isn’t secure then the messages aren’t.

        • hypnicjerk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 天前

          whatsapp is closed source and meta owned. i think it’s incredibly foolish to trust that it has no backdoors built in.

          • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 天前

            That’s not how encryption works. But you’re not wrong about it being owned by meta being a problem. There’s more info in a message than just the contents.

            • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 天前

              you say that but they’re already thinking a step ahead and assuming meta left a backdoor or CVE at the behest of 3-letter agencies.

              What’s facebook’s business plan? Right, surveillance capitalism.

              • ptu@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                2 天前

                IIRC whatsapp’s automatic backups are stored in cloud and unencrypted by default. So it takes only one person in the group chat who has backups enabled (pop up reminds periodically if not) and no password is set (not required, takes effort and will to set) to leak everyone’s messages.

              • airgapped@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 天前

                I assume no encryption is safe from three letter gangs, at this point I’m only concerned with keeping grubby corporate fingers at bay.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      Works better than Teams.

      Probably has better privacy and confidentiality options too.

    • Spykee@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 天前

      There’s “WhatsApp for Business” & “WhatsApp Business Solutions”.
      Catch-up, grandpa!

      • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 天前

        I’m aware the technologies exist - I can’t fathom wanting my sensitive communications served by meta.

        Also, grandma* - my pronouns are right there.

            • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 天前

              Tbf, I don’t read unames, and my app shows the pronouns in line with and the same color as the unames, so I don’t read those either.

              Literally no clue who I’m even responding to right now. Doesn’t really matter who it is either, my response would be the same regardless of your race/gender/whatever else.

              The one exception is whenever I see something profoundly stupid I will sometimes check the uname and go “ah yes cowbee again how predictable” but that’s just pure entertainment and learning who here not to waste energy on, most comments are just comments and don’t warrant that level of self preservation.

            • buttnugget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 天前

              Wait, what confusion? I use Voyager and I have no confusion about who is whom. I can see in the lower reply box that you are balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one.

              The only issue with pronouns is that people who assume default maleness should be locked up anyway, so that’s an entirely separate issue.

              • Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 天前

                People who assume default maleness should be locked up anyway

                Huh? What the heck did i just read?

                • buttnugget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 小时前

                  You read your moral and intellectual superior explain reality to a bunch of morons. Don’t pull this “we speak other languages” excuse because it’s 1000% bullshit and you should be embarrassed to think it let alone say it.

                  People, nearly entirely men, assume maleness by default and it has nothing to do with language. It is just morons being morons. My joke about locking people up highlights your unfathomable idiocy in assuming gender when talking to others.

                  • Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 小时前

                    First of all: you should feel ashamed about yourself because you just started using insults in a civil conversation.

                    It’s not bullshit, it’s just reality, if i am used for all my life to say “i poliziotti hanno fatto un ottimo lavoro a risolvere la questione” (Masculine plural, used in language to refer to a group of people in which at least two different genders are present.) Translation: Police have done a good job to resolve the situation i am also gonna use “sei un poliziotto talentuoso” (Masculine singular) Translation: You are a talented police officer {The bold-italic indicate what gives the gender and if it’s plural or singular} For talking in a text chat with someone i don’t know the gender.

                    You see that if i am a Italian speaker i am gonna use masculine simply because i am used it since…well since i know how to speak and it’s a hard change since in Italian you would have to change a bit more than in english your way of speaking.

                    Here a good source to understand better how it works in italian:

                    1- mascluine and feminine

                    2 - articles: how they define gender and amount

                    From your comments i can suppose you speak only english/english is your main language or you only speak languages that have the neutral pronouns

                  • Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    23 小时前

                    Yeah…but then what should i do? Many people have as a mother tongue a language that is gendered (the case for many langs in europe and south america since they come from latin) and usually male is used as standard when you don’t know the interlocutor gender or is used to describe a group that has 2 or more genders.

                    Saying something like

                    People who assume default maleness should be locked up anyway

                    Is just wrong because you are just blaming innocent people for doing something they have been doing all their lives for reasons beyond their control.

              • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 天前

                Context is important and voyager does not provide that. Many people respond to the wrong person in threads. For example you just replied to me about pronouns which isn’t my topic.

                • buttnugget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 小时前

                  The pronouns thing was the main topic, son. You’re being obtuse. We can all see who we’re talking to with Voyager.

                  • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 小时前

                    The visibility of information was the main topic, dad. We can all see the name of the person we are currently responding to, dad. Whether that’s the same as a prior discussion, dad, is hard to see, dad. Just fuck right off.

      • balance8873@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 天前

        I think those are for sales, like b2c advertising. Not for how your business talks to each other internally to destroy databases.