Don’t call anyone pro-roman slurs. Rome is doing enough damage to the world. They were responsible for the Holocaust in the 1930s and they’re doing it again with their new orange emperor.
The German Nazis considered themselves to be Romans and all others to be “b*rbarians”. That’s what Third Reich means. The first Reich was the Holy Roman Empire. They considered themselves the inheritors of Rome. Roman ideology is fascist ideology.
ahh I see where you are coming from. Then this quote by Engels, which Rosa Luxembourg might have been paraphrasing, would likely be more to your liking “… either a revolutionary constitution of society at large or the common ruin of the contending classes”
I prefer the words of our Lord and saviour Jesus Christ,
Ah. So, you follow a religion that supports things like chattel slavery, Belgian Congo, Manifest Destiny, the Holocaust and the Lebensraum, the genocide of Palestine, colonialism in general, etc.
weird how Rome and most of the adherents of your religion can band around doing damage to the world despite the “differences!1!!” your book has in interpretations.
Can you imagine how you sound to people with profound religious trauma? Do you ever think of these things? Like I appreciate the militancy but the religious dogmatism is genuinely concerning as I’ve seen EXACTLY what that has done multiple times not only in history books but in real-life.
Your belief in Jesus Christ isn’t what is the problem. It’s your religious militancy and the rhetoric I’ve seen repeated.
I will keep that in mind if I meet any non-romans.
I’m not a Roman.
Then I won’t call you a slur
Don’t call anyone pro-roman slurs. Rome is doing enough damage to the world. They were responsible for the Holocaust in the 1930s and they’re doing it again with their new orange emperor.
first of all
second, barbarism is a proper way to describe fascism and what it does to people
The German Nazis considered themselves to be Romans and all others to be “b*rbarians”. That’s what Third Reich means. The first Reich was the Holy Roman Empire. They considered themselves the inheritors of Rome. Roman ideology is fascist ideology.
ahh I see where you are coming from. Then this quote by Engels, which Rosa Luxembourg might have been paraphrasing, would likely be more to your liking “… either a revolutionary constitution of society at large or the common ruin of the contending classes”
I prefer the words of our Lord and saviour Jesus Christ,
We must drive the rich to Elohim’s judgement by the hand of a righteous crusade. And also, stop denigrating b*rbarians.
Get a new bit. This one sucks.
Ah. So, you follow a religion that supports things like chattel slavery, Belgian Congo, Manifest Destiny, the Holocaust and the Lebensraum, the genocide of Palestine, colonialism in general, etc.
True, but that’s ignoring one of my favorite Bible passages
weird how Rome and most of the adherents of your religion can band around doing damage to the world despite the “differences!1!!” your book has in interpretations.
We must declare a holy crusade against Rome and begin World War 3 against the fourth Reich.
Can you imagine how you sound to people with profound religious trauma? Do you ever think of these things? Like I appreciate the militancy but the religious dogmatism is genuinely concerning as I’ve seen EXACTLY what that has done multiple times not only in history books but in real-life.
Your belief in Jesus Christ isn’t what is the problem. It’s your religious militancy and the rhetoric I’ve seen repeated.