• Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    7 days ago

    I just don’t understand anticheat or copy protection on PvE games. I can understand it if you don’t want to play against a cheater, but this is a cooperative shooter.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      See you’re looking at it from the point of view that it would serve the player experience, but that’s not what it’s for, it’s to mine your data

    • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s for precedent on future games and to sneak in shit for later. Wittle down your expectations and privacy, make it “normal”.

    • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      IIRC Borderlands 3 scales the value of loot to the game’s difficulty setting, with some mechanics aimed at encouraging players to join online coops at high difficulties in order to earn more valuable loot. I imagine cheats undermine that intent, and I also imagine borderlands 4 might be aiming at a pay to play scheme.

      I’m guessing this EULA is being used for all their IP with the intent of taking advantage of it in the future.

  • REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I sometimes wonder what will happen when EAC, that has root access to millions of PCs, gets compromised or has grunty employee and pushes malicious update

      • UltraMasculine@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        That’s right. I’m not lying at all when I say that none of my friends care about privacy. It’s actually quite frustrating.

          • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Then the death squads will come in, and they’ll ask ‘how could this possibly happen!?’, getting fucking pissed or saying “we couldn’t have known!” when you answer, and offer an ‘i fucking told you so’ in line for the camps.

            You’re there too, because they tagged you in everything.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It probably spys on you already.

      The company that makes the Overwolf game launcher is an Israli cyber security company that gets money from the US.

      Tencent spys on people for China through a lot of the games they own.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        Holy fuck I did not know about Overwolf. That’s the last time I download something from my, apparently, dipshit friend (no, this is not the only stupid thing he’s done).

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Yes that’s the problem, he doesn’t know a lot of things. He also doesn’t seem very keen on learning them.

            He’s young, so I still have hope for him but god damnit he’s stupid and a potential hazard apparently.

        • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think it’s kind of ironic you call your friend apparently a dipshit for not knowing something you also didn’t know… pot calling the kettle black & all.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            from my, apparently, dipshit friend (no, this is not the only stupid thing he’s done).

            Reading comprehension is hard. I get it.

  • mcv@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    If a game, application, device or EULA changes in a way you find unacceptable, after you’ve purchased it, you should be able to get your initial purchase price back. And if you paid with your data, you need to be able to demand they delete all your data. I think that law would be entirely reasonable and would do a lot of good.

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    They added spyware to it.

    Here is excerpt from the tos, shared by user in steam reviews of the game.

    important Info in Terms of Service:

    • Mods are a bannable offense • Display of Cheats/Exploits is bannable • Forced arbitration clause and a waiver of class action and jury trial rights for all users residing in the United States and any other territory other than Australia, Switzerland, The United Kingdom, or The Territories of The European Economic Area • You can be banned for using a VPN while connecting to online servers • Cannot access game content on a Virtual PC

    Collected Data Types: • Identifiers / Contact Information: Name, user name, gamertag, postal and email address, phone number, unique IDs, mobile device ID, platform ID, gaming service ID, advertising ID (IDFA, Android ID) and IP address • Protected Characteristics: Age and gender • Commercial Information: Purchase and usage history and preferences, including gameplay information • Billing Information: Payment information (credit / debit card information) and shipping address • Internet / Electronic Activity: Web / app browsing and gameplay information related to the Services; information about your online interaction(s) with the Services or our advertising; and details about the games and platforms you use and other information related to installed applications • Device and Usage Data: Device type, software and hardware details, language settings, browser type and version, operating system, and information about how users use and interact with the Services (e.g., content viewed, pages visited, clicks, scrolls) • Profile Inferences: Inferences made from your information and web activity to help create a personalized profile so we can identify goods and services that may be of interest • Audio / Visual Information: Account photos, images, and avatars, audio information via chat features and functionality, and gameplay recordings and video footage (such as when you participate in playtesting) • Sensitive Information: Precise location information (if you allow the Services to collect your location), account credentials (user name and password), and contents of communications via chat features and functionality.

    I wouldnt touch anything this company has produced.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      They added spyware to it.

      No, they didn’t.

      Just because something sounds outrageous, doesn’t mean it is true.

      Borderlands 2 hasn’t been updated since 2022:

      Borderlands - Last updated: 3 August 2016 Borderlands 2 - Last updated: 4 August 2022 Borderlands 3 - Last updated: 8 August 2024

      No Borderlands titles include anti-cheat: https://areweanticheatyet.com/?search=borderlands

      Here is another person, 7 years ago trying the exact same outrage-based engagement farming strategy of linking a TOS update and implying a nefarious intent: https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/8naopt/take_two_a_spyware_apocalypse/ It’s exactly the same “Take two is spying on you!!!” content and yet, none of the Borderlands games have added spyware and none have added kernel anti-cheat.

      Also, if you read the 2018 and 2025 TOS you will notice notice that the information that they collect in the 2025 TOS ( https://www.take2games.com/legal/en-US/ ) is exactly the same as it was in 2018.

      TL;DR - Just because you read it on the Internet, doesn’t mean it is true.

      • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Interesting. So the terms of service have not changed, and yet people are saying that they did. I wonder if there are criticisms that are still valid. For example, the terms of service that you linked:

        • do not let me use a VPN (¶6.4)
        • do not let me use glitches (¶6.4)
        • do not let me own the copy of the game that I bought, but instead give me a limited license to it (¶2.1-2.2)
        • do not inform me about future updates to their terms of service (¶10.2)
        • force me to enter arbitration and do not let me be part of a class action lawsuit or have a trial by jury (¶17.5)
        • link to their privacy policy, which:
          • does not let me opt out of having my data bought, merged, and sold through ad networks or data brokers (§ Categories of Information Collected, § How We Use Information and Our Legal Grounds, § Sources of Information We Collect, and § When We Share Information ¶ 5— all sources combined)
          • does not attempt to deliberately minimize data collection to protect my data. With the only exception of children’s data, their purposes are extremely vague (§ How We Use Information and Our Legal Grounds, as well as the entire document, because they do not attempt to do this in their privacy policy)
          • does not attempt to anonymize my data (I cannot provide a citation because there is no attempt to do this in their privacy policy)
          • does not specify the purposes of gathering and using information about any installed application on my device (§ Categories of Information Collected— this is especially worrying)
          • does not let me opt-out of data collection categories for specific purposes (cannot give a direct citation because they simply do not do it; instead, they wrote vague types of information they collect —such as “details about… other information related to installed applications” in § Categories of Information Collected, as well as vague purposes in § How We Use Information)

        So, coming back to the original claim you were debunking:

        They added spyware to it.

        Your response was

        No, they didn’t.

        And I agree with you, now that I have read their terms of service and their privacy policy. Of course, we’re assuming that they haven’t changed their terms of service. If we assume that, then their spyware clauses weren’t added. No. They were always there. They have always said that they gather “details about… other information related to installed applications” on my device for purposes that can include merging and selling my data to data brokers and ad networks.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          The language about collecting and using data have been in TOSs for basically every online service since the early '00s.

          I’m not saying that this is okay. The data that these services collect, which we’ve given them unlimited rights to, has only become more valuable and the incentives for these companies are always for them to gather more data about you.

          You can use archive.org if you want to look at older policies from the same company. But, if you pull up any other game with an online component you will see that they all are essentially “Don’t cheat our services or hide your identity, We’re going to collect your data and use it how we want, and you have to enter into binding arbitration” with various levels of detail and verbosity.

      • Yermaw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I sometimes wonder what I casually believe because I read it while scrolling for something interesting. I don’t have the time or inclination to fact check every single detail I come across.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m sure I believe a lot of nonsense from reading the Internet.

          That’s okay, we’re just human. The problem is when people try to ‘inform’ people of things that they ‘know’ from reading social media. That’s how these situations are created, so many people believe this because so many other people believe it and then repeat it as fact without themselves ever checking.

          It’s like a feedback loop of ignorance, caused entirely by people who care more about getting social credit for talking and less about saying things that are true.

  • LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ok so that explains the bad reviews, but why is steam giving the game away for free? Also BL3 is heavily discounted

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 days ago

    LOL. I loved the Borderlands franchise, until Epic made their evil dog shit app store and the Borderlands devs sold out to them. Motherfuck Borderlands forever now. Thanks for the warning so I don’t accidentally reinstall any of it from Steam.

    • baatliwala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Bro get a life, it’s not that serious. Evil app store lmao as if they’re out to murder you and your family

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I know thats not a risk for you, but this data could genuinely be used by the us government to do that in the near future, for many marginalized populations.

        Especially queer people and anyone who could be seen as an immigrant.

        Some of us have real problems in life, and have to actually give literally a single fuck about the world.

        • baatliwala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Yes, the government is going to get you by installing spyware in a game launcher that nobody uses. You won’t care a shit about or vet at code level any of the 200+ closed source games you will play in your life because they’re all fine in your fantasy land, but one game launcher is out to kidnap you.

  • L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Y’all really going to freak out over the new paralegal being told to update the EULAs and lazily hitting the update all button?

  • Dagamant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    395
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    You literally posted the answer to your question. Here is an expansion of the details.

    • Goodeye8@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      199
      ·
      8 days ago

      I haven’t read the new TOS but if this review is correct it looks like a GDPR nightmare for them. Good luck to them explaining why they need to collect all that personal data.

      • avattar@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        8 days ago

        That might be US only, where the companies have freedom to get all the customer’s data and do with it as they will.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 days ago

          The list where this doesn’t apply seems to basically be every country with consumer protection laws.

          They obviously know this won’t fly pretty much anywhere other than the US so that’s all they’re trying to push.

        • Peter_Arbeitsloser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          I just read the german version and compared them a little. (https://www.take2games.com/privacy/de/) Its about the same. But ist also reads fairly normal like any other privacy policy. I also think its in line with EU law. The collected data always relates to whatever TakeTwo service you use and whatever data you provide voluntarily or technically by using it. Thats fine by EU law.

    • moon@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      8 days ago

      Due to Steam’s tos updates a few months ago, isn’t take-two opening itself up to a massive lawsuit?

    • Nephalis@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Hm… Ok. Thats crazy. Someone wants to create a new branch of income it seems.

      Thats a fucking shame. Now I need to reconsider my plans to buy Borderlands4.

      But how will they do it? Which information is gathered from which source? Most of my accounts only hold as little informations as possible. Also my Os knows nothing about me. My MS account neither.

      On the other hand my steam 2FA need some mobile information.

      • Dagamant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        8 days ago

        Unless you use Linux, your OS knows a ton about you. On top of that, with root access to your computer they can do whatever they want and if their system gets hacked you become a member of a bot farm or crypto mine.

        • Nephalis@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Well I use Linux, but not on my gaming pc. I would switch to it because its all amd, but I don’t want to because it lacks the driver suite for my gpu (adrenaline) and I don’t want to install a bunch of small applications to gain a small fraction of options it offers.

          It’s a pitty. Because I realy want to ditch windows since its newest iteration.

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Don’t just review bomb it

    Report it to steam as SPYWARE, with the little flag icon on the product page

      • Owl@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 days ago

        Steam has a history of removing things people don’t like (for example: banning ad-ridden games)

        So if all these reports can bring them to add this to their TOS, it’s worth it

      • Owl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        absolutely. Steam is not to mess with and takes such matters quite seriously.

  • Ledivin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    That. The content of the screenshot you posted. That is what’s going on.

  • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago
    • Did the EULA change? ✅
    • Were all Take Two games automatically updated in secret and now hijack your machine with root access to spy on everything you do? ❌
    • Do Take Two games contain code to report telemetry and user information(including application/system activity) to a home server? ✅
    • Is this EULA change extraordinary and particularly egregious in comparison to others that most people have probably already agreed to? ❌(IMO)
    • Are people riled up because e a YouTube video went a little viral and now they’re all playing telephone to the point where it’s now gotten to the point of random dumdums are review booming a 13 year old game claiming it’s turned into literal spyware? ✅(again, IMO)
    • Should you be surprised by any of this if you’ve been even remotely paying attention for any period of the last 30-40 years? ❌
    • Do we need more than just angry idiots in the battle against corpatocracy? ✅

    We should be done coddling the late comers at this point. Yes welcome them and accept them, but at a certain point your level of ignorance became a detriment to your community and you should be made aware of that fact.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Pretty much nailed it, yep.

      A youtuber named Hellfire has been on a spree, basically discovering how fucked up EULAs have been in games for the past 20ish years… well this is all brand new news to him and and his Zoomer / Gen A followers.

      There is, as of right now, literally zero evidence that Borderlands 2 has been updated with a rootkit, with kernel level anti cheat, anything like that.

      The last update to its game files was 2 years ago.

      This is almost certainly them updating the EULA everywhere, the precise timing of this being for some specific arcane legal and business reasons… TakeTwo runs a whole bunch more games than juat Borderlands… namely GTA V…

      Is this EULA bad? Yes.

      Is it much worse than it was before, or what other large gaming companies EULAs have, and have had for… a decade+?

      Maybe by a bit, but not really, no.

      Is Randy Pitchford a dumb idiot asshole?

      Oh absolutely yes, but that shouldn’t give people the liscense to make completely unevidenced claims about other things.

      The game does not have a kernel level AC or some kind of rootkit DRM, as many, many people are currently saying it does.

      I guess gamer attention span can really hold onto a few keywords and phrases at a time.

      … I say this all as person who is vehemently against kernel level AC, who has been pointing out for 4 years, that almost all existing anti cheat systems currently have at least one game that implements their AC, on linux, without using kernel level anything… it is entirely possible to do AC without kernel level shit, even on linux, and has been for at least 4 years. EAC and BattleEye have supported linux for 4 years, but nearly no game that uses them has actually used this feature/available and offered support.

      I am glad that this level of hate is finally being directed at shitty EULAs, but lets at least get our facts straight, or actually provide some hitherto unseen evidence that Borderlands has had some kind of sleeper malware in it for at least the past two years, just waiting to be activated by a TOS update to every single Take Two game.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Would it shock you to know that ALL of these are in the Steam terms of service also?

        The only really sus one to me is the forced arbitration clause, and Steam also had that til they were pressured to remove it by multiple legal cases, including a class action brought to them by Steam users just last September. It is only sus because it’s outdated - companies are generally removing them now rather than adding them. https://www.legal.io/articles/5540864/Valve-Removes-Mandatory-Arbitration-from-Steam-Subscriber-Agreement

        RE: remaining top 5 bullet points, 3 of the remaining 4 bullet points are uncontroversial bullet points about anticheat. The fourth is banning modding, which is also just a heavy handed anticheat attempt, and not uncommon for online games to add to their ToS to allow banning at their discretion. Either way its clumsy at the least as some mods can be harmless eg HUD mods for colourblind people and deserves some negativity - but not to this level, given everything else is just so boilerplate.

        Collected data types: these are all for if you buy stuff with a credit card / paypal / etc off 2k/parent company Take 2. Remember, they sell games with in-game purchases. They also have an app which has location permissions option which is what the precise location is about.

        So yes - again, as OP said, this is nothing controversial if you have paid attention to ToS meaning and content over the past 20 years.

        Aside from the forced arbitration crap - which Steam, Microsoft, Amazon, Lyft, Uber, Google, AT&T - and hundreds of other major companies all snuck into their ToS over the years, and many have now been legally pressured to remove by consumer rights group. That is stupid because it shows their legal team is behind the times, companies are mostly removing their forced arbitration clauses nowadays because it has been the cause of many lost class actions.

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        A bit more than what, not really sure what your point here is? All of those bullet points are similar if not identical to terms in other EULAs half the people in this thread have already clicked thru.

        I’ll say it again, if you think this is anything new you haven’t been paying attention. I’m all for calling this fuckery out and pushing for something better. But like where yall been?

        Still no actual answers from anyone on how this is ‘more’ than what I described in my op. Sure it’s a more detailed list, but it’s really not the “gotcha” everyone seems to think it is. That is, if youve been paying attention.

        • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          45
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          What point are you trying to make? You say you’re “all for calling this kind of fuckery out” but then you’re criticizing people for calling it out? And who cares what other EULAs might say? The point is that the license agreement for this game and others owned by this company didn’t say this shit before, and now they do. The company is actively making their user agreement more hostile to the users which is what people are pissed about.

          • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            The point is that the license agreement for this game and others owned by this company didn’t say this shit before, and now they do.

            That’s just not true.

            Here’s a Reddit user trying the same kind out outrage farming 7 years ago using Take 2’s TOS and implying it allows spyware: https://www.reddit.com/r/gaming/comments/8naopt/take_two_a_spyware_apocalypse/

            If you look at Valve’s TOS or any other game developer who has games with an online component, you will see the exact same language regarding data collection. The language being added is to comply with laws, like the GDPR, which requires specific language indicating what data is collected and how it is used.

            The data that is being collected is the same as it was 10 years ago. There’s nothing new here, just a YT video that got a lot of views and social media being full of people who don’t fact check anything.

          • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            That it takes more critical thinking to accomplish the organized action needed for real change than leaving a bunch of negative reviews.

            I never once said ‘other company’s do it so just deal with it.’ Fuckawhataboutism. I said “if you think this is new, you haven’t been paying attention.” What I shouldn’t have left unsaid was ‘the review is a nice start and show of intention. but we need a lot more dedicated, well organized action, to actually accomplish any change.’

            But people read into things what they want to hear.

        • MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          ·
          7 days ago

          Let’s ride the wave. Turn this into a huge controversy known industry-wide. Then, next game that comes out with EULA like this, we say “THIS GAME HAS A BORDERLANDS-STYLE EULA”. Pretend it’s new to exploit the shock value and get the gamers riled up. Then, the industry gets better.

          Tell the frog that the pot wasn’t always this hot.

          • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Thank you for an actually constructive response. You’ve honestly brought me around a bit with this.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I see this kind of comment before and I will never understand it - “other companies do it so just bend over and let us do it to you too!”

          People say this all the time about Denuvo too: “Other games already have Denuvo, why are you crying about it here when you’re playing other games?”

          And see, that’s the problem - we aren’t playing those other Denuvo games. And same thing applies here, guess what, a lot of us aren’t buying games from gross companies like EA with these shit terms. So when a company we are doing business with suddenly changes their terms to be shit, that’s a valid complaint. Some of us have already been boycotting bad business practices in the industry, so the idea of company changing terms towards the boycott after we’ve already invested in the game feels like a betrayal because it is.

          So maybe stop focusing on what you assume the rest of audience is doing and instead go back to focusing on what the people at the goddamn podium are trying to pull?

          • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            Why does everyone insist on adding the ‘so just bend over and take’ part whenever someone points out another source of wrongdoing? Like what do yall always take it to mean that the speaker is implying a whataboutism argument? And not maybe as ‘oh shit this has been going on longer than just this maybe we should learn about that too and we might figure out why it hasn’t been stopped yet.’

            • Vespair@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              If “everyone” keeps reading a sentiment you did not intend out of your message, perhaps it is time to consider that you are doing a poor job of communicating your point.

              Or you’re being disingenuous and just don’t like being calling on your hissy fit.

              I dunno, take your pick.

              • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                It’s the first one, I’m terrible at effectively communicating nuanced points.

                And I mean yall could interrogate the statement instead of reaching a conclusion and then responding but I get it.

                But also, fuck that. Do more work as the reader.

                Also, piss off with your infantilizing ‘hissy fit’ bullshit.

        • Don_alForno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Some people will always find an excuse to change nothing.

          It doesn’t matter how many similar EULA’s people have already accepted. The best moment to not eat it anymore would have been the first time it happened, the second best time is right now.

          Also, retroactively amending an EULA is a different quality, since people have already paid for the game and would be locked out after the fact if they didn’t accept.

          • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m sad you read this as an admission of defeat and an attempt to deter others from fighting. Was hoping for more of a ‘you’re late, you have a bunch of homework to catch up on’ vibe but I’m not great at communicating all the time.

            • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              It seems like you’re giving of a “victim” vibe with this by stating you wished for only a particular type of “positive response” when you’ve posted a misleading comment and doubled-down with “EULAs half the people in this thread have already clicked thru” which you have no way of knowing.

              Were all Take Two games automatically updated in secret and now hijack your machine with root access to spy on everything you do? ❌

              10.2. Updates, Modifications, and Sunset. We may provide patches, updates, or upgrades to the Services, Virtual Items, Content, or your Account that may be required for you to continue using the Services, including automatic or “in the background” updates without notice to you.

              “Was hoping for more of a ‘you’re late, you have a bunch of homework to catch up on’” You’re expecting others to hold your hand and inform you of every event or action taken by every company. I guess I’ll do my part since I have been trying to let other people know for a while now,

              StormGate - Privacy Policy and End User Agreement. Is this just the new industry standard to avoid? (post made by me 10 months ago)

              Why don’t you see it more?

              Steam Discussion deleted after questioning the “EULA” of Stormgate, another post by me after I tried to inform others and was suppressed, meaning the reviews is the only course of action that most have at their disposal. Even posting on their official subreddit did no good with the exact same type of response you’ve presented here,

              Why am I consenting to have my “Medical Information”, “Browser/Search History”, “Social Security/Drivers License number”, “Geolocation and movements”, and more collected to play Stormgate? (22k members, only 122 upvotes)

              (the responses)

              • They didn’t collect such information (they technically couldn’t), they are giving examples of such types of personally identifiable information.
              • Yeah, it’s excessive, they don’t need half of this. However, writing it this way makes it near impossible for them to screw up by accident. If you play games, you probably agreed to a handful of ELUA’s like that by now.
              • This keeps getting brought up in every controversial game these days and the answer is always the same: They aren’t.
              • Most of this is not out of the ordinary.
              • Imagine thinking all of this information about you isn’t already owned by several corporations lol.
              • Some of these stuffs are required in X countries not yours, stop thinking the entire world is all about you buddy.

              You’ve officially become part of the problem and an ally to the very same reason why we can’t “accomplish the organized action needed for real change (than leaving a bunch of negative reviews.)”

        • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 days ago

          If more folks are waking up and shaking a stick at it or doing something but blindly click through (thus legally unenforceable) EULAs I’m all for it.

          Better late than never.

          • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I get that and agree, this is just a crappy and kinda dumb stick to be wasting the energy on because it makes the side opposing the injustice look like petulant children instead of enabling effective action.

        • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t click thru any EULAs. I see bad EULA - I pirate. Then if it makes any network traffic i just block that shit.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      7 days ago

      So…if Steam is running in a Flatpak, and Borderlands is launched from Steam, how much can they even see…really?

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        So…if Steam is running in a Flatpak, and Borderlands is launched from Steam, how much can they even see…really?

        Without using exploits to escape the container, not much. A very empty Windows environment with a single game installed, your network interfaces and any directories that the Flatpak has access to (usually just the SteamLibrary directories).

        The TOS (https://www.take2games.com/legal/en-US/) changes are mostly related to data that they collect via their interfacing with Steam and through their website. This idea that they’re requiring you to agree to a root level access or installing a spyware rootkit is just nonsense.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Not a lot. Even when it isn’t a flatpak windows software running on linux won’t be able to interact with the system anywhere near as much as on windows.

        They’ll be able to tell it’s linux, though.

      • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        You can install an application like Flatseal (https://flathub.org/apps/com.github.tchx84.Flatseal) to inspect the permissions for a flatpak.

        How locked down a flatpak is depends entirely on the developer and what permissions they request. By default, they can’t really see much. For example, they can’t even see the processes running on your host or your user and system files.

        Flatpak does not do anything about network access though, it can only do no access or full access, no in between. The data they can collect on Linux in a Flatpak is very limited but it does not prevent them from calling home.