If only they’d put all the slop under one sub domain!

Why is OP searching for it?

It’s YouTube.

We can’t disprove the the soul, god (ethical or not), or the afterlife if we’re talking about unprovable things. Because we can’t know that there isn’t some incomprehensible reason why the best decision would be the current state of things and also somehow be ethical. But, like I’ve said, I don’t really think it’s worth debating the unprovable/undisprovable and anyone making definitive statements about what a reality beyond our own would look like while also claiming it can’t be proved should be ignored as untrustworthy.

Why do you think it’s fake?

If you’re feeling especially strong about it you could call the cops for a welfare check on them.

If we’re talking about unprovable things literally anything is possible. Because it’s unprovable.

I personally don’t bother worrying too much about things we can’t prove or disprove like that, but it’s important to remember that just because we can’t prove something doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. My philosophy is that if there is some sort of beyond that whatever is out there is similar enough to ours that they’d be able to empathize with the decisions I make and judge me accordingly, assuming there even would be some sort of judgement process. I’m at peace with it. I was raised evangelical, and lots of my friends were. One of my atheist friends used to have nightmares about an eternity in hell. I don’t think anyone who loves us could do that. And if whatever is there is different enough that our decisions don’t matter then it’s arbitrary anyways and there’s no sense worrying. It’s not about “being okay with an amoral god.” It’s just an acknowledgement that the idea of a reality we can’t prove further than our own could exist.

But anyone making definitive statements about something like that shouldn’t be trusted. Which rules out pretty much all religions because many make claims like that.

Plenty of people do. Whether they should or shouldn’t and whether they should claim it’s objectively real is different. But plenty of people believe in those things without proof.

On TikTok I’ve seen an ad showing literal penis in vagina. But people have to say “unalive.”

It doesn’t mean that there’s no soul, god, or after life, just none that we can prove in any meaningful way.

Honse

I am obligated to comment on this due to my profile picture. 💜

That’s me!

BORTLESSSSSSS!

It pisses me off that you gotta pay so much money to look at the official ISO 8601.

Fuck HDCP.

Did you ever use Atom?

Alright, they do call the notes that, but calling that gun “the murder weapon” is inappropriate. It robs Mangione of his presumption of innocence.

Police searched Mangione’s backpack during the course of that arrest and found a 9 mm handgun and a notebook with potentially incriminating entries, among other items.

I have a much bigger problem with calling that gun “the murder weapon” anyways. That’s the bigger issue of the two.

How do you know it’s the murder weapon? Why do you think the notes are likely incriminating?