Who will the Supreme Court side with? thonk

  • tooting_lemmy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    There really is no way without blatantly disregarding the constitution. It would lead to the collapse of the United States.

    • CarbonScored [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The US has blatantly disregarded the constitution loads of times. To pretend that breaking it now would necessarily lead to collapse is a bit weird.

      • tooting_lemmy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think there’s a difference between ending democracy and whatever you’re referring to.

        • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Letting someone run for additional terms isn’t exactly ending democracy. If anything, stopping people from voting for their preferred candidate because they’ve already been president is less democratic than allowing additional terms.

    • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      There is. The Constitution isn’t clear on how the 22nd (anyone who has served two terms is ineligible to be elected president) and the 12th (anyone ineligible to be president is ineligible to be Vice President) interact. Notice the difference in wording, the 22nd is specifically about being elected president, not being president.

      So theoretically he could be elected as VP and have his running mate resign to give him the presidency again. The only thing that would really stop that is a Supreme Court ruling, but the Supreme Court is mostly Trump appointees.

      Or of course he could take a page from his buddy Bukele and have the Supreme Court say “nah you’re good to be elected again” despite the Constitution clearly saying otherwise.

      • Tabitha ☢️[she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        So theoretically he could be elected as VP and have his running mate resign to give him the presidency again

        I don’t even think the resign part is necessary for the right to continue business as usual.