EnsignRedshirt [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 67 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 26th, 2020

help-circle

  • Granted it’s unlikely we’ll ever see anyone like him again, but I think it’s worth noting that nothing has changed about the electoral system that would prevent someone taking a similarly unorthodox path. “Trump vibes” isn’t going to be a problem if someone is actually doing the Trump playbook properly. No one in the media or political establishment wanted Trump in the first place, and they all had to eat shit in 2016 when he single-handedly took over the GOP. Someone else could do it again if they were brazen enough.

    Trump isn’t a genius, he just happened to stumble into a way to win the rock-paper-scissors game against the establishment civility and norms fetishists. They haven’t changed or learned anything in the last 8 years, and it’s unlikely they’ll smarten up this time around, especially if he loses again. The core vulnerability is still there. The game still depends on people following the rules, and if someone else comes along who doesn’t care about those rules, they’ll be able to do the same thing.

    US electoralism is still a huge cargo cult joke that deserves no better than Trump, is what I’m saying.


  • Last night was really helpful for cleansing my twitter feed. General consensus was obviously that Trump ate shit, but you could tell from the comments who was watching the debate to hear what the candidates were saying vs who was there just to cheer on Harris and/or see Trump fail.

    One of the minor but notable differences I’ve noticed between Canadian electoralism and American is that there’s very little room in American discourse for just being a hater. It seems like you have to pick a side, and if you say anything bad about one side then you must necessarily be supportive of the other side.

    In Canada, we have the same two mainstream neoliberal parties that are the only ones who ever form government, but then there are several other parties and interest groups that have legitimate amounts of support and some representation in the legislature. If you say you hate Trudeau, there are too many possible angles you might be coming from for me to make any assumptions. You could be a conservative, an NDP/Green supporter, a Quebec nationalist, an indigenous person, anyone from BC or Alberta, the list goes on. It’s true of any Canadian politician, party, or interest group, so you can freely shit on anyone and everyone without people being able to assume your specific political leanings.

    In Canada, someone like Hasan would be able to be like “Boy, that debate sure was a pile of dogshit” and proceed to roast each candidate on the merits, but in the US the algorithm needs you to declare or else it presumably shunts you into the unserious crank category.








  • Trump attended as many primary debates as Biden did. The difference is that the RNC actually held debates, because they were running a competitive process. The DNC just backed Biden as a matter of course. No consultation, no attempt to present options to voters, not even a token attempt at an open discussion. The primary was a procedural formality. That is what a coronation looks like. Trump, despite his many, many flaws, put himself forward and won the Republican primary. Not attending the debates was a dick move, but given his popularity with Republican voters, and his overwhelming victory at the end of the day, I find it unlikely that it would make a difference. Hell, there’s an argument that it might have hurt his chances.

    I’m just saying that Walz’s position that the Democrats are a functioning party while the GOP is a cult rings a bit hollow. The DNC unwaveringly supported Biden as he was slurring his words and falling down stairs until he eventually quit due to not wanting to suffer an embarrassing loss. The GOP had their shit together while the Democrats were scrambling to replace their candidate. The fact that they seem to have avoided catastrophe doesn’t change the fact that they were the ones who steered themselves into catastrophe in the first place. A little humility wouldn’t be misplaced.







  • There’s also the role of Islamic banking. Sharia prohibits usury, which results in different banking standards. I don’t know if or how Islamic banking is any better or worse than western banking, in theory or in practice, but the fact that there’s a different standard at all has to be a problem for western powers-that-be.

    Finance is arguably the most important tool in the western imperial domination toolbox, particularly because the west makes all the rules. They can’t just allow alternative modes to compete on an even playing field. If there’s a financial system that exists that doesn’t abide by their rules, it has to be challenged and mitigated, or else they’d lose control of the system.

    Banking is just one example of the overall thing you’re describing. The existence of a system of organization that could challenge western hegemony in any way is a threat, and Islam has the potential to challenge it in multiple overlapping and self-reinforcing ways. Different interest groups within the western power structure probably see Islam as a threat in their own ways, but they can agree with one another that it’s a problem and work together to oppress it, regardless of whether they’re against it for ethnic, cultural, religious, political, financial, etc. grounds.