Leaked videos showing four Georgia defendants speaking to prosecutors in the racketeering case involving former President Trump are bringing into focus the ex-president’s desperate grab for power after losing the 2020 presidential race.

“The boss is not going to leave under any circumstances,” then-White House deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino told ex-Trump lawyer Jenna Ellis, according to Ellis’s testimony to Fulton County prosecutors a day before she entered her guilty plea.

“We are just going to stay in power,” he said. The videos, first reported by ABC News, place Trump at the top of the chain of command of efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia in his favor.

The defendants’ proffer statements bolster the narrative Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis laid out in her 98-page indictment charging Trump and 18 co-defendants with joining a criminal enterprise bent on keeping Trump in the White House.

  • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    A trial date has not yet been scheduled in Georgia, though Willis indicated Tuesday that a future trial could stretch into early 2025. Trump’s first criminal trial could get underway in just four months, with his federal case over efforts to overturn the election scheduled to begin on March 4.

    Won’t he be like… eternal supreme leader by then?

    • books@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, that will be interesting.

      Curious if any constitutional experts can weigh in on how that looks. I assume the sc would have to weigh in.

      Like he can’t pardon himself since it’s a state crime, but I can’t imagine a president sitting behind bars.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like he can’t pardon himself since it’s a state crime, but I can’t imagine a president sitting behind bars.

        Nobody can, because no president has done what he’s done. Even Nixon, the other obvious presidential criminal, didn’t try to cling to the presidency. We don’t have a clear law, precedent, or mechanism to guide what we’re supposed to do, so here we are, on the raggedy edge.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          We do have several clear laws, including an amendment. People are just afraid to enforce them.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            The laws aren’t clear enough, unfortunately, because the powers that be are afraid to call what he did an insurrection or coup. They prefer to hem and haw over perceived nuances while pretending they were ignorant of his rhetoric and behavior years before Jan 6 and the 2020 election.

            • flipht@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think everything is plenty clear. It’s just that half of our “leaders” are hoping he’ll drop dead before they have to make a stand, and the rest don’t want to make a stand because anything they do here can and will be used against them for frivolous reasons in the future, and they don’t want to draw fire or call attention to themselves.

              Something something tree of liberty

            • Maeve@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              While there is a point Fear can become complicity, this is just complicity.

          • Maeve@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            People in power have no reason to fear. It’s glaringly obvious it’s complicity, at this point.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        He can’t pardon himself anyway. Nobody can. He may say he’s doing it, and his followers and pet judges will accept it if he does, but please don’t normalize the notion that pardoning oneself is any more real than dividing by zero.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          he will have the full United States army behind him.

          Not a chance. The military is sworn to the constitution, not the commander in chief.

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              People die when they refuse to follow orders.

              There’s so much wrong here. Firstly, the US military isn’t the Russian military. The worst that’s going to happen for refusal to follow orders is an article 15. When that order is basically a governmental purge or cracking down on protests? Jesus christ the paperwork would be insane. Nobody is going to do that shit. Not to mention the president is severely limited in how he can use federal troops in the country, so whatever he wants to do probably won’t be legal anyway. He can’t use the national guard without a request from the state’s governor, and I guaranfuckingtee they won’t be his brownshirts either.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Start imagining it. The only thing ever manifested began with “what if.” For example, what if we got as belligerent about demanding the laws be enforced on all corruption, rather than just poors doing whatever they do to survive and cope?

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s monumental about those videos is one of the defendants leaked them (at whose behest, I don’t know). It could possibly intimidate future witnesses, so “learning for double sure that Trump was trying to cling to power” (duh) is really not the point people should take away from them.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is sad, and more righteously so, infuriating that people are so sad and cowed (Looking at the “legal” apparatus, from doj to fbi to legislators to courts). You know who’s mad enough to do something, anything, are those who would crown him supreme dictator; the left are still wandering around with “vote blue!”

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Leaked videos showing four Georgia defendants speaking to prosecutors in the racketeering case involving former President Trump are bringing into focus the ex-president’s desperate grab for power after losing the 2020 presidential race.

    The videos, first reported by ABC News, place Trump at the top of the chain of command of efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election results in Georgia in his favor.

    “The entire idea behind the indictment is that Donald Trump was driving the bus and doing so in a way that was only intended to secure power,” said Anthony Michael Kreis, a law professor at Georgia State University.

    ABC News on Monday afternoon published videos of Ellis and another former Trump lawyer, Sidney Powell, giving confidential interviews to prosecutors.

    Chesebro also distanced himself from Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, two other defendants in the case, and described the Capitol attack — at which he was present — as the “worst possible thing that could happen,” according to the Post.

    But with numerous ex-Trump lawyers testifying that they continually sought out ways to reverse the election results at the former president’s behest, such an argument becomes much more challenging to make.


    The original article contains 999 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 81%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!