• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Imagine building military bases in foreign countries then freaking out when a foreign country builds a military base in yours: the US finally gets to know how it feels.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Exactly what expeditonary capacity does Qatar have? US based across Europe and Pacific are in compliance with NATO and other defensive treaties. US and Qatar have no such agreements. This entire deal is just Trump and co pocketing a bribe.

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Exactly what “epiditionary capacity” does the US have? They don’t need permanent bases on foreign soil any more than foreign countries need bases on US soil. US taxpayers certainly don’t want to pay for all this armed forces bloat.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I mean the US is one of the few countries that can put like 30k dudes in country at the drop of a hat with thousands more coming right behind. It’s the only reason some countries dealt with us at all.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Those countries can learn to take care of themselves: the US doesn’t need to let them freeload by outsourcing armed services to the US instead of investing in their own. While all that US taxpayer spending to bloat the armed services isn’t appreciably improving US living standards with better social services (education, healthcare, poverty & work programs) or going to foreign aid, those countries investing less in their armed services from this arrangement get to dedicate more of their spending to improve their living standards with better social services.

            Alliances don’t require permanent foreign bases: allies can train with & host partners on an as-needed basis when the occasion demands. US taxpayers would prefer to invest in better alternatives that appreciably improve their lives.

            • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              55 minutes ago

              Unfortunately, even if we could convince them to cut military spending, they wouldn’t use the recaptured funds to improve American life, they’d just give it to the Sociopathic Oligarchs

              That goes for both MAGAs and Dems. The Dems are no different than MAGAs, they would much rather smooch the donors than the voters.

              • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 minutes ago

                they wouldn’t use the recaptured funds to improve American life

                Probably not, but at least it’s not wasted on armed services & foreign bases US taxpayers don’t want or need. The mere fact it could be spent better is enough reason not to spend it there.

              • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                31 minutes ago

                It answers why the US doesn’t need bases on foreign soil & why its taxpayers don’t want them either.

            • monogram@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              As if trump, or any of the newly elected right wing European prime ministers are going to invest in social services. It’s all about austerity or war machine funding.

              • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                34 minutes ago

                None of that changes the fact that US taxpayers don’t want to overspend on armed services with their foreign bases & none of that is necessary for an alliance: they’re unneeded & unwanted.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s also ironic to see some Americans whine about the military invasion of their cities while they’ve been doing much much worse in other countries, against international laws. It’s only appropriate to surround a building with helicopters in the middle of the night, invade their homes, force whole families outside and treat them like animals when it’s done by heroes finding WMDs in a country full of terrorists, not in American cities.