So literally no impact. That’s what, half a percent or less of something that’s already a small percent of the total emissions and functionally negligible compared to the emissions from industrial and large scale logistics sources.

Meanwhile doubling emissions so companies can try to sell each other chatbots that sometimes guess how many "r"s are in the word “Miami Dolphins” correctly is just like normal, healthy economic growth.

Sorry athsmatics, we’re banning inhalers. We have 500,000 additional cars to sell and one of us has to go

You know what’s really good for respiratory issues? Cars

Okay I guess I’ll just die so we can keep the oil and coal barons rich.

The older I get, the less time I have for this shit. getting bulldozed into a mass grave would be too good for these writers.

Cool now do AI

WHAT!!! MASS-PRODUCING INHALERS ARE IN-FACT, PRODUCING EMISSIONS??

This is ridiculous. Yes, we probably can reduce the emissions from inhaler production BUT THERE ARE worse industries like AI or Fossil Fuels that ACTUALLY impact the planet…

So you see, it’s rather simple. Grandma must die and coal must be dug from the earth to fuel her cremation. It’s for the good of the climate.

500,000 cars! MY GOD!

Instead of inhalers we must mass produce copium

cnn going anprim or something?

even if inhaler production was the same as a billion cars we would still have to make them, they are lifesaving medication
we would just have to figure out how to minimize the impact or suck it up

CNN with another handful of pearls to stuff into their bag of infinite clutching.

You claim to want to reduce CO2 emissions, yet you produce CO2 every time you exhale. Curious!

Inadvertently be adding to the problem lol suck off me. I’m not reading this but it reminds of people who’ve swallowed whole the idea of carbon pollution being an aggregate effect of individual consumer choices that we as individuals can change.