…again. If it sounds familiar it’s not just you. But they’ve been back on “undecided” shortly after. Let’s hope this is the actual final decision.
…again. If it sounds familiar it’s not just you. But they’ve been back on “undecided” shortly after. Let’s hope this is the actual final decision.
How does this “once and for all” part work? Is there a clear, legal path towards preventing a similar proposal from being brought up again and again?
I guess ideally, we should put the right to encrypted communication into law or even into national constitutions. Unlikely to happen though.
Finland already has it in constitution, though it’s not about encryption but just right to privacy on private messaging. It was originally created to protect snail mail communication