Context: this piece of filth barged into Psych 210 (The Diversity of Human Sexuality) throwing up nazi salutes, yelling Heil Hitler, and calling everyone “removed removed” (edit: and “removeds”). Class didn’t appreciate it.

waow-based

  • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you refuse to interact with anyone who is succdem or further, how the ever loving fuck will you be able to build any kind of movement?

    At some point it just seems like complaining for the sake of complaining.

    • wideopenarms [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, cause that’s the meta on the site and the place I choose to complain about it cause it’s a commie forum. I’m not in the bluesky replies saying “yeah but what about your 3 arrows avatar” cause, as I offered as a caveat to the complaint originally, it’s shitting on something that doesn’t necessarily deserve it in the moment.

        • purpleworm [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          People use “commie” to refer collectively to all ideologies that are interested in getting rid of class society, as well as specifically to talk about Marxism. I am very certain that they meant the former in this case. This is not a “left unity” forum that gives any respect to views that it is capable of recognizing seek to perpetuate class society indefinitely, as socdems do.

      • Barabas [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most are still down to sit at the table if the language is dressed in the right liberal phrasing - like a 3 arrows graphic!

        So what do you suggest people should do when confronted by a social democrat?

        I don’t see anything wrong with pointing out that they are liberals, but I’m confused by the implication of that statement.