WATTERS: And then they sabotaged the teleprompter. I mean, this is an insurrection. And what we need to do is either leave the UN or we need to bomb it. It is in New York though right?

GUTFELD: Yeah, it is.

WATTERS: Could be some fallout there. Alright, maybe gas it?

DANA PERINO (CO-HOST): Let’s not do that.

WATTERS: Don’t gas it. Okay, but we need to destroy it. Maybe can we demolish the building? Have everybody leave and then we will demolish the building.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    229
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The UN is headquartered in New York. This guy therefore is directly calling for terrorist acts to be committed on US soil. That’s slammer-worthy.

    Who’s doing the political violence again?

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        “akshually.”

        You do get it, right, buddy? It is located within the boundaries of the contiguous lower 48. Moreover, in its most populous city.

        Quit being obtuse.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          52 minutes ago

          Yeah, but he’s right in that it’s not US soil, so if someone does bomb it, the American justice system can just ignore it and foreign powers don’t have any power over American citizens located within the boundaries of the US anyway

        • JonEFive@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’s like saying an embassy is not US soil. Sure, politically, that might be true, but for all non-political purposes, it very much is within the US.

          • dickalan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah, I know, I just don’t have time for pedantic people trying to make bullshit comments when they know the absolute truth is that it’s on US fucking soil

          • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’s not even true. Embassies are not extraterritorial and remain the territory of the host country.

      • Daemon Silverstein@calckey.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        @hyperhopper@lemmy.world @ExtremeDullard@piefed.social if it’s international soil, why (and how) could US deny Mahmoud Abbas from attending the UNGA, especially during an increasing recognizance of State of Palestine from other countries and the current UN proposals towards a two-state solution? I can also point out examples of this regarding an the country I reside: why (and how) could US make it difficult for part of the Brazilian delegation (such as Ricardo Lewandowski, current Brazilian Ministry of Justice, and Alexandre Padilha, current Brazilian Ministry of Health, the latter of whom ended up not attending in protest to all the restrictions imposed by US) to attend the UNGA?

      • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Downvoted for actually knowing the truth. Am I back on Reddit?

        “though the structure is physically situated in the United States, the land occupied by the United Nations headquarters and the spaces of buildings that it rents are under the sole administration of the United Nations. They are technically extraterritorial through a treaty agreement with the U.S. government.”

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headquarters_of_the_United_Nations

        • Deceptichum@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Downvoted for being a redditor by missing the point to argue something inconsequential.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            50 minutes ago

            It’s not inconsequential if there’s an attack though? It being on foreign soil means a high level judge appointed by Trump can literally just rule that no laws were broken on US soil.

        • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah. I’m confused. I mean, it’s legally intentional territory but functions as part of New York for obvious reasons. It’s a little more nuanced, to say the least.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Okay and what would happen if that were bombed or gassed? It doesn’t matter if the land is politically separated. Bombs will physically destroy it and the surrounding area. Therefore it is not the truth in this context because we are speaking of the location of the land itself.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            50 minutes ago

            It makes things worse actually. It being on foreign soil means a high level judge appointed by Trump can literally just rule that no laws were broken on US soil.