• SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I love how the entire economy hinges on taking a machine that is able to statistically approximate a mediocre plagiarism of different styles of text and insisting that it is an omniscient magic fairy capable of complex reasoning.

    • roux [they/them, xe/xem]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I use AI a lot for my programming hobby becaus I don’t have anyone to work with, my stack is fairly unique/new, and StackOverflow is dead. Over the past 2 years, this is also my assessment. AI does a very bad job at guestimating a close to correct response. It’s almost never correct, and if it is, it’s the most inefficient way of being correct. It’s plagued with hallucinations and the fact that whole industries are not only replacing programmers way smarter than me with it, but relying on “Token Plinko” for decision making for these industries is truly terrifying.

      Not to sound too doomer, but this AI bubble isn’t just going to pop, it’s going to implode. And it’s probably either gonna take whole sectors down with it or it’s gonna be absolute hell on companies restructuring and going back to human labor.

      ETA: If you ask ChatGPT to rewrite a chunk of text without any emdashes, it will keep them in and either reword the rest, or just spit out the exact same thing you fed it. It’s a nice ironic bit of info I stumbled across.

      • Sebrof [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I use it for code too and ive noticed the same problems. Sometimes it does really help (me save a search on StackOverflow) but other times it gives me odd spaghetti code or misunderstands the question, or like you said if does something in an odd and inefficient way. But when it works it’s great. And you can give it a “skeleton” of the code you want, of sorts, and have it fill it out.

        But if it doesn’t get it on the first try, I’ve found that it will never get it. It’ll just go in circles. And it has just rewritten my code and turned it to mush, and rewriten parts I tell it not to touch etc.

        I’m not as big on the anti-LLM train that the rest of Hexbear is on. Its a very specific tool, I’ve gotten some use out of it, but it’s no general intelligence. And I do like joining in the occasional poking fun at it.