• toast@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    2 days ago

    “We don’t need separation of faith and politics. We don’t need separation of church and state."

    Yeah, yeah you do.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    2 days ago

    Those who established that separation had lived in a world without it and knew how it negatively affected both the government and the religions. Saying it’s not needed shows a combination of ignorance of history and a desire to be the one religious group who gains power over others.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, the founders knew of what they spoke, since The Inquisition was still ongoing in their lifetimes.

      There is no way they set up this country as a secular country by accident. Or didn’t mention Jesus once in the Constitution as some kind of “oversight”, and actually really meant to imply this was a xtian nation, even if the Treaty of Tripoli later spells it out that we are not a xtian nation…

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    These fucking morons forget that the primary, actual, material reason that the Founding Fathers did the whole… seperation of church and state thing?

    Yeah, yeah, it was to prevent the myriad groups of extremist sects of Christianity that comprised the early US… from fucking oppressing and killing each other, via the government.

    Remove that seperation, and within half a decade we will literally have Y’all Qaedas for each fucking cult and denomination fire bombing each other, doing mass sectarian violence amongst themselves and those they all view as heretics.

    I guess it will be funny(?) if we end up with the Mormon War, round 2.

  • RYS@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Which of the 100s of churches? 😂

    Anyhow, religion should be so far away from the state that even God can’t see the nation…

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I think what this indicates is that he doesn’t comprehend what “separation” means in this context. Or “church” for that matter.

    Would he really have no issues with the Pope ruling the US by papal decree? Or the king of England (the leader of the Anglican/Episcopalian church)?