Rhaedas

I know there’s a way to figure that out, but I have no idea where to start. So I’m going with 1 in 3000, plus or minus 42.

So then he’s a capitalist, all about consumption.

The odds of a US nickel landing on its edge is about 1 in 6000. If there are any other country’s coins thicker the odds would probably get better.

Incorrect. It can land on two different sides. Or it can roll off the table and under something, leaving you in a state of limbo.

Best of luck. I don’t have much relationship experience, as the one I fell for I’m still with for 30+ years. But even though it was a young crush and all the rush to get closer, we’re friends first and foremost and I think that is the key to a lasting relationship, no matter how far it goes. If it takes a while to develop, it will be better for it.

If the lines were rotated some 22 degrees you’d have more of a realistic regional division of foods types for most places. As it is G and D has so much diversity that it’s not much of a loss either way.

I’ve always thought that the best password security possible would be to always have the real password fail a few times. People who know their password will keep trying it, someone else will try a different one. It’s a variation of not giving an error that tells what failed.

You seem to be past the biggest hurdle that people have, communication. Only you two can truly say what’s best for each of you, but my opinion is to find the common denominator, which is her level of caution and development. Reason being, if you push her faster or farther than she feels is comfortable, you’re not doing it for both of you but for yourself. If you’re already close to begin with, either something will mutually happen or it will stay the same, and there’s nothing wrong with that. I don’t think you can do a trial run and then step back to before.

Above all, continue to talk about it. I think no matter what happens, being open with each other will have better results than trying to make something happen that isn’t ready or isn’t there for one of you. You might find that your efforts to let her breath allows her to figure out where she stands and gives you what you want.

Romans were occupiers too. I mean, what did the Romans ever do for them?

As the other replies said, tax breaks and cuts to regulation. But it’s also that they know there’s cycles in politics, so they get what changes they want from the right, and then count on the left to fix the economy the next time around. Much like riding the market. The danger is when things go too far and the system breaks. The dwarves corporations delved too greedily and too deep. Now they have a balrog to contend with.

I don’t know why you got the downvotes, maybe I’m missing something. If that’s true, that’s pretty impressive to have that far back in some type of documentation. My surname trail goes cold after going from the US back to Britain in the early 1700s.

They also have to be fluent in original English (Celtic). This Germanic originating crap they speak now was brought by immigrants.

Picard, his face in palm. Riker, his grin wide.

Those who established that separation had lived in a world without it and knew how it negatively affected both the government and the religions. Saying it’s not needed shows a combination of ignorance of history and a desire to be the one religious group who gains power over others.

That seems to be true of a lot of ideas that are deemed “socialist”. Invest in people’s welfare and it will be magnified.

“I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy.”

I think the full context is even more damning. He would have rather pitied a person that try to understand their pain.

A country that cares about their future will invest in their children. It’s another version of planting a tree that you won’t enjoy the shade of.

People who own a home will adjust the prices to try and sell them. Not willingly, and not quickly, but if they have to change they’ll take a hit. Who won’t sell are all the corporations that bought up everything when it was a hot market going up. They can afford to sit on an unoccupied house for a long time waiting to at least recapture the investment they made.

There are already religious chatbots out there, and not surprisingly they’re not that great. Combination of LLMs that questionably stay on topic and are accurate mixed with the data of religion that has numerous fallacies and inconsistencies - what could go wrong?