so

uh

  • WrongOnTheInternet [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    The nuclear option is changing senate rules by simple majority, as opposed to the three fifths majority usually required by the senate rules

    Usually discussed in relation to the theoretical filibuster (I don’t think half of them would survive trying to actually filibuster something), but not exclusively

      • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        you know how filibustering is giving a long speech to slow down congress? for a long time now, they’ve considered the threat “i’m going to filibuster” to be equivalent to actually doing so, and thus cloture, the vote to end discussion, which requires 60 votes, became a sort of theoretical filibuster. instead of an actual filibustering tactic, it became “you need 60 votes now” without the actual speaking. liberals, man.

        • blunder [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          These ghouls would drop like flies if they actually had to stand and speak for that long. Let alone have to actually hold an idea to be able to speak to it