Curious who’s gonna regulate it after they knee capped the FDA
I’m ready for that psycho to die. I don’t care how he goes. But he does need to go. Go on down to the lower room. Where his drug addled cracked out demented ass belongs.
RFK JR actually says something intelligent… That’s something I never thought I would experience.
I’m ready to make him fight for this, even as I agree with him that those chemicals are an issue. Just not the issue he thinks they are.
The more time he sinks into this, the less he has to throw disabled people off of bridges.
I’m sure it wasn’t intentional
The dyes must be harmful to the worms
Only decades after other countries kicked them out. Some of those common American food dyes are illegal even in China, of all places.
I mean I don’t care. At least then I wouldn’t have vaguely orange spoons after making Mac-n-cheese.
You don’t care? You don’t care that you are being poisoned but you’re kinda happy your spoons won’t have a funny color.
Is this the American Educational system in practice?
His “point” is that food dyes cause cancer, hyperactivity, and autism. It’s a great horror story I’m sure. Not really a point.
I hate dyes because they are a form of advertisement.
For those interested in the actual science part of the article:
Why the fuss over food coloring? Are natural dyes really that much better for our health?
“They’re better for some people’s health,” says Jamie Alan, a professor of pharmacology and toxicology at Michigan State University. “There is a very small percentage of children who are very sensitive to these dyes. And when they eat these dyes, they display behaviors that we sometimes associate with ADHD.”
Alan stresses that there is no evidence that those kids actually develop ADHD. But research has found that after eating foods containing certain dyes, children, including those diagnosed with ADHD or autism, can show signs of hyperactivity, moodiness and inattentiveness. However many of these foods, particularly candy and soda, also contain sugar, which has also been connected to hyperactive behavior.
Alan recommends that parents talk to a pediatrician and try an elimination diet to make sure the dye and not another ingredient is to blame. But she largely supports phasing out artificial dyes; most public health advocates think this is a good idea. “In my opinion,” Alan says, “because we’re talking about children and because they are a vulnerable population, I do think this is a great thing to do. But I will recognize that it is not going to impact the vast majority of the population.”
None of this changes the fact that Robert F. Kennedy is a fucking moron.
Interesting duh moment right.
Agreed. I wonder if he came up with this himself or someone from his team. There are plenty papers that cautiously correlate said dyes with abnormal brain functioning.
And my personal opinion, there isn’t any reason for such dyes to exist in food. Candy or soda shouldn’t have to look like “Demon Core Green”
So… sugar correlation being taken for dye causation. Ok
Sugar doesn’t actually cause ADHD behaviors. There’s no casual link between sugar consumption and hyperactivity
https://www.verywellhealth.com/sugar-and-adhd-what-you-should-know-5207992
I never said there is causation. Indeed, I explicitly used the word correlation.
However many of these foods, particularly candy and soda, also contain sugar, which has also been connected to hyperactive behavior.
Hopefully it is just the article being poorly-written and not MSU making terrible studies and/or Jamie Alan being a dunce.
“Dyes cause kids to be temporarily hyper, also, the food with the dyes has sugar in it which could actually be the cause.”
…
Stopped clock. Hell, even a backwards running clock is right ever so often.
… A backwards-running clock is right more often… Unless I’m misreading what you meant.
deleted by creator
You’re not misreading but you are thinking too much about the analogy.
Reading deeper, some backwards clocks can be an accurate projection of working ones if used with a mirror.
I get it, because we want to do the opposite of what RFK Jr wants the majority of the time.
A backward clock can be an accurate projection of a working one with sufficiently timed strobes
Its right twice a day every day. Pretty fuckin generous analogy lol
This reminds me of the study that said that people drive more colorful cars in times when the economic outlooks are better.
So, the colorfulness expresses their character and their outlook towards a positive future.
A colleague told me of a similar study that related shorter skirt lengths on women to better economic outlooks.
huh, when i learned about the hemline index i learned about it in the inverse, but basically what i learned about macro is that it’s bullshit.
Non-peer-reviewed research in 2010 supported the correlation, suggesting that “the economic cycle leads the hemline with about three years”.
from the article you linked
very interesting, now i know the name for it :)
Let’s fix this society, if only for shorter skirts.
hell yeah!
I’m ready to let go of RFK Jr.
I want a roadkill-eating, worm-brained psychopathic junkie out of my food, can I have that?
The answer is yes. Everyone around me thinks the crap they allow in our food is bad for us. Europeans done have the same issues we do with food because they’re much more regulated.
There are probably lots of ways we need to improve our food supply and our health, but focusing on food dyes is at best a trivial part of that.
It starts with the research, the science, to identify actual harmful things and truthful labeling so consumers can be aware and have a choice. It almost certainly reins in marketing and lobbying . This is where he needs to spend time, yet is doing the opposite. Cutting out research, regulations, truthful labeling will have far more harm than tilting at windmills could possibly benefut
Everyone around me thinks the crap they allow in our food is bad for us.
Without evidence of course. Just the same lack of critical thinking that RFK has. It “seems bad” and “it’s chemicals”.
Europeans done have the same issues we do with food because they’re much more regulated.
BS.
Avoidance of completely unnecessary chemicals is just reasonable. I don’t need to be sold on not adding something that isn’t needed. Why would you need proof that being marketed to with bright colors is not worth a health risk?
You’re focusing on things that in moderation didn’t actually have any negative effects. At the same time, harmful chemicals from deep frying foods that are actually with diseases get a free pass
I agree with banning any dye that has evidence of harm, but let’s not get it twisted. Americans are unhealthy because of eating too many calories, too much processed meat, too much fried food. This change won’t make any difference
it’s this administration. so i’m gonna guess it’s because ‘pride colored’ candies and other foods use them.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23026007/
Just one of many studies that raise concerns. Yes, they pump rats full of a fuckton of these chemicals that no normal human being will ingest. You could say the same thing about tons of other chemicals that have turned out to be carcinogenic. We don’t have the funds to give rats/animals normal doses over the course of a normal human lifespan, so pumping high amounts to shorten the duration is the next best thing.
Red has proven to be the most difficult color to synthesize due to how red colors oxidize or break down in the environment. The natural red colors all fade rapidly which makes them poorly suited for industrial purposes.
It’s why carmine is a godsend because it’s both stable but it breaks down in the environment. It also has an incredibly long history as a food dye and has proven to be safe. Unfortunately it’s derived from insects so it’s regarded as being… gross? Weird how consumers prefer health consequences over bugs
Well, that and it makes it non-vegitarian. I remember when Starbucks used insect derived dyes and vegetarians were pissed off when they weren’t told their drink technically had bug in it.
That said, we eat bugs (and poop, etc) all the time since there’s a legal amount you can let slip into food when processing. So eh.
One of the most striking quotes I’ll always remember from a documentary is “natural peanut butter has more bugs in it because natural ingredients always will”. When you’re eating processed peanut spread, the ingredients have gone through a lot more filtering and processing steps and allowed insect parts are lower.
I still eat natural peanut butter though
Gotta love that extra crunch!
And protein. It helps make the peanut butter slightly leaner and have slightly more protein!
Hydrogenated oil vs having to mix? Mix, definitely, unless physical limitations preclude it.
Is the food industry doing this research the way fossil fuel and tobacco did research?
I dont know but didn’t big tobacco become a big food company and it then used its discoveries on addiction to enhance its food products
Like a true satan
Are you referring to Philip Morris/Kraft?
ETA idk if Staryucks is still doing it, but several years ago, they were adding extra caffeine to their coffee to make it more addictive.
Lol 😆 @ staryucks
They mostly divested but the addictive technology remains in their scaly hands. But yes its something like that because they still own some food producers
Yes, they pump rats full of a fuckton of these chemicals that no normal human being will ingest
“Dosage make the poison” comes to mind. If it’s safe below those levels… Then it’s not harmful. “BUT IT MIGHT BE” is not a coherent argument. I’m not necessarily against banning a substance that has little functional use out of an abundance of caution - but lets not pretend that it’s going to save any lives since it’s very unlikely to do so.
Just because some turn out later to be carcinogens doesn’t make it a valid way to find them.
Sir, this is Lemmy. If the corporations do it, it’s bad no matter what it is.
A red dye was recently banned because it was found to be carcinogenic. How many others are as well but just haven’t been looked at closely enough.
A red dye was recently banned because it was found to be carcinogenic.
That is very oversimplified…
Carcinogenic is not “true/false” it is probabilistic. The EU has a lower standard of evidence required for banning a substance than the US. In the EU if there was any evidence at all of it being carcinogenic in animal studies (whether in realistic quantities over realistic time periods or not) means it will be banned (I’m over-simplifying some here as well). The US standards are different.
You could say that this is a better standard as it is more cautious. I may agree. But you can’t say “it was banned because it was carcinogenic” without a lot of qualifiers.
There are plenty of qualifiers, thats literally why other countries BAN them.
All a distraction. Yes some of these ideas aren’t bad. We don’t need this fuckhead to implement them.
That’s why we need this fuckhead to implement them. This fuckhead is doing so many things that will harm and even kill uncountable number of people and there doesn’t seem to be anything we can do about it. Let him waste time on food dyes. Maybe it will help a small number of people who are sensitive but at least he’s not spending his time on something harmful to everyone. Let him distract himself from the evil schemes
LOL this is great!
